This is the first time i complain about a Decision

[manliest_Man]

I know better than your average Joe,not to go online and complain about an unfair decision.I usually dismiss instantly any simillar post.But this i believe is worth looking into.

I used to think that some decisions were unfair back in EA UFC 1,but i didn't even know how scoring worked back then,ever since i read the official UFC rules,i can safely say,i almost am never disappointed at a decision.I pretty much know by the time a game ends if i won it or lost it if it goes at a decision. And that's not taking into account the cutscenes it shows at breaks to be able to tell who won the round.

I usually make fun of people who complain about a decision,because i tend to conclude that they are ignorant of how the scoring and the octagon control works and especially since everyone in this game keeps walking backwards while holding high block,since it's too OP and too Easy to do,i tend to deny their claim of a wrong Decision from the get-go just based off on that.

That is until this happened to me. I am not sure if the other guy knew any loophole or any exploit on how to win the decision,but you can see for yourselves it's pretty ridicilous. I have an edited video uploaded along with the round score photos for those who don't want to watch it.

Overall from the stats,only thing you can think of justifying him winning, is that he might have gotten 2 close submissions which won him the round.I'll have you know that is false as you can see from the video,his submissions didn't even pass the first gate.Only 2 submissions attempted 1 in the 2nd and 1 in the 3rd,both failed without passing a single gate.

So here we go with the video:https://youtu.be/Z90aODtGtIo

And now with the photos:

Overall: http://imgur.com/l9eIY5c


R1: http://imgur.com/cspnmmt

R2: http://imgur.com/tnTjAeP

R3: http://imgur.com/ctTGbrz

Every single round,i destroy him at striking and in the first 2 rounds,striking takes place mainly on the ground/clinch,which i also dominate him. He never got a full guard/half guard/side control/full mount dominant position over me,only i did that.He did however get the dominant sprawl 2 times i believe.His submissions 0/2 successfull,both canceled before him passing the first gate. I clearly won every round,some by a little bit,some by a lot. It can be debatable that he won the 3rd round as i let him have most of the octagon control as i was messing around,since it was a quick match and i was certain i had won the first 2 rounds,because i dominated him on the ground but the stand-up was pretty equal,since he had good octagon control,but didn't do any damage unlike me,who also got a knockdown second round.


__________________________________________________ ______________________________________
EDIT 15/16/2016

watch this self explanatory video: https://youtu.be/i84YbnjK5PY

I edited it a bit and made it a bit entertaining,because that's all you can do at the end of the day on bad scenarios like these, just laugh them off.

Hope you enjoyed and please fix the broken decision system.

This fight i was dominating the ground + stand-up center of the octagon,so when i heared that, i obviously knew i won the game. Apparently not..

[EJ_Manuel]

Again, and I stress this in EVERY thread like this. Coming forward wins you the round. When you backed up against the cage constantly in the third, you gave him the round. Doesn't matter if you landed more strikes, HE CAME FORWARD. Judges will always reward aggression and coming forward more than number of shots landed. So he won the third. The second you obviously won, and you probably won the first too. BUT, the lesson here is,


Don't be a turd..(especially when you have Conor vs. Jury. I mean jeez. Do you want a cookie?) And finish the fight when you have a chance.

[manliest_Man]

Quote: Originally Posted by EJ_Manuel

Again, and I stress this in EVERY thread like this. Coming forward wins you the round. When you backed up against the cage constantly in the third, you gave him the round. Doesn't matter if you landed more strikes, HE CAME FORWARD. Judges will always reward aggression and coming forward more than number of shots landed. So he won the third. The second you obviously won, and you probably won the first too. BUT, the lesson here is, Don't be a turd..(especially when you have Conor vs. Jury. I mean jeez. Do you want a cookie?) And finish the fight when you have a chance.

As i said,i know how going forward wins you the round. I was certain i had won the first 2 rounds,so i started running around to annoy him in the 3rd round,since i had the game in my pocket. But still,even going backwards most of the 3rd round,i still landed way more than him and if you look at the stats,it was his worse round.He did the least on that 3rd round.

[chapmandachamp]

Dana white wants the game this way to encourage the fighters to fight and not go to the judges. Not to dance around to annoy ur opponent "when u know u won"

[Ksearyback]

People who use McGregor and don't get a knockout deserve to lose.

[scyth223]

Don't leave it in the hands of the judges.

[Robalboa]

regardless of what ever connor won that fight hands down

whoever sets up this judging algorithm is insane.
How could you lose because of where you where in the ring compared the the FIGHT it self. look at his stirkes.

i find if you just get on top of a guy and lay there you win the round too even if he landed 30 sigs before you got on him.

i won fights with 2 strikes only the opponent had about a 100
but i guess laying there is more important than busting the guys teeth out

[Haz____]

Quote: Originally Posted by EJ_Manuel

Again, and I stress this in EVERY thread like this. Coming forward wins you the round.

DIAZ 1-2-5