post the golfer 10 times and see if only 5 get deleted

http://www.ufunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Human-motorcycle-bodypainting-4.jpg

My cousin is one of the circus people forming the bike in this.

What we can do is instead of making new posts, edit old pages and add in hot pics. The mods probably wont click on older pages. We just need some code word to signal which pages we are editing.

haha, the resistance has begun!

....wait scratch that...resistance is futile.

My cousin is the model near the tunnel.

She must date black guys...

:eek:

:devil:

haha, the resistance has begun!

sadly i've also thought of doing this. then i think - what the hell is wrong with me to care so much?

Mom, Doug's doing it wrong!!!!!

Nah dude, god's doing it wrong.

I think she has spray-on nipple stuff; otherwise, she would have popped out.

Now go to DeleteLand.

http://adland.tv/files/video_thumbs/112502/112502_0000.png

Banned!!!! Can't show that much pussy in one picture.

Get to the next page and you've got a chance

Banned!!!! Can't show that much pussy in one picture.

hehe, if the individual mods don't take ownership for the deletion of posts and images, is that showing too much pussy, and therefore bannable?

I thought some people here might appreciate this:
http://img2.etsystatic.com/000/0/5544284/il_570xN.195155106.jpg

Raptor Dinosaur Metal Art Key Rack by KnobCreekMetalArts on Etsy (http://www.etsy.com/listing/62499729/raptor-dinosaur-metal-art-key-rack?ref=shop_home_active)

I think I see the raptor.

I see that the golfer was deleted.

Seriously?

Personally I think the mods are just trolling now. It's actually pretty damn sexist deleting pics of a woman golfer taking a shot in a tournament. How is that in any way nsfw?

Seriously?

Personally I think the mods are just trolling now. It's actually pretty damn sexist deleting pics of a woman golfer taking a shot in a tournament. How is that in any way nsfw?

Whoever is reporting the images has been trolling for some time now. Again, any attractive woman can be deleted regardless of pose or amount of clothing at the whim of the one who is trolling or mod. The standard is equivalent to rolling dice. Any mod trying to say otherwise merely needs to look at the last four or so pages.

I doubt anyones reporting them.

The caption just kinda made this photo "You never know who you'll run into at a Def Leppard show in Vegas!"

https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/554148_10151661149748465_1352934701_n.jpg

The caption just kinda made this photo "You never know who you'll run into at a Def Leppard show in Vegas!"

https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/554148_10151661149748465_1352934701_n.jpg

That's exactly who I'd expect to run into

It was originally on page 352

I'm guessing this one would be removed if this lady was about 60 years younger. Still awfully impressive.

Johanna Quaas, 86-Year-Old Gymnast - PositiveMed (http://positivemed.com/2012/12/30/johanna-quaas-86-year-old-gymnast/)

http://positivemed.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/granny-gymnast1.jpg

It was originally on page 352
Here's the link I used: The thread for images so cool that they belong in this thread - Page 338 - Front Office Football Central (http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/showthread.php?t=60049&page=338)

Subby, since you're already "banned", I kind of expect more hot chick pic postage from you in here. Post #18828 is a great start, but keep going.

I love this so much. I'm sure I said something to the same effect back on 338.

I have this strange sudden urge to rush out & buy Fabrege shampoo.

And then tell two friends.

http://images.ridemonkey.com/index.php?size=full&src=http%3A%2F%2Fmedias.omgif.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F03%2Fpolice-troll.gif

Seconded

She could spank my money. - most obvious reply ever.

Phew.

Am I the only one who kind of feels bad for that monkey? Am I the only one here with a heart?

Omg

What a poor mattress

Dutch, just to be safe, permalink?

I am semi-back.

Any picture that I perceive to be an attempt to push the limits I have written in the sticky will be deleted, likely without further explanation. I have deleted several. It has already been explained and I, for one, am not willing to waste words saying the same thing over again. If you want action taken for pictures in this or another thread, just report the post and an evaluation will be made.

Bottom line: don't try to push the limit on "hawt chix" posts, and you won't get suspended. Push it, and you might. It's really that simple. And it's not up for discussion. In the time I have been away, some people have gotten away with some things that shouldn't have happened. So be it. But know that further complaining, sarcasm, whining, attempting to push the limits, or other jerk-ish behavior around this policy, either in this thread or elsewhere, will result in punitive measures.

Well, I think that went well. I'm just glad my 'hawt' granny pic stayed up. It's a keeper.

"Push it, and you might."

What a chicken-shit, cowardly, lack of ownership response.

Punitive measures, indeed, because mod's decisions carry no logic, consistency, or accountability - much less that they are hidden and need give no explanation or reasoning.

Fuck you and fuck this bullshit.

http://images.ridemonkey.com/index.php?size=full&src=http%3A%2F%2Fmedias.omgif.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F03%2Fpolice-troll.gif
Would love to know if there is a story attached to this.

http://i.imgur.com/HI13Siw.jpg?1

Would love to know if there is a story attached to this.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gyiAPLHUfMw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

"Push it, and you might."

What a chicken-shit, cowardly, lack of ownership response.

Punitive measures, indeed, because mod's decisions carry no logic, consistency, or accountability - much less that they are hidden and need give no explanation or reasoning.

Fuck you and fuck this bullshit.I have no idea why I have to explain this VERY simple concept over and over again.

You "might" because I "might" not see it. IF I see it, you WILL.

I wonder how an Olympic sprinter warming up is considered "pushing the limits," but whatever...

I wonder how an Olympic sprinter warming up is considered "pushing the limits," but whatever...If I perceive that the primary reason for posting the pic is "ZOMFG LOOK HOW HAWT SHE LOOKS," then it's gone. As I said pages and pages ago in this thread:

"Just don't post anything remotely prurient, and you won't have any problems."

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gyiAPLHUfMw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I love how the cops have to throw it into reverse on a one way street potentialy causing an accident instead of just pulling over and walking/running back to the fake camera.

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gyiAPLHUfMw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

This was hilarious. Thanks for sharing that bad boy

Dumb question but hey ... what purpose is the "What Are You YouTubing Of Late" thread if this one gets video?

Presumably the answer is "none", but I thought there might be some distinction I missed somewhere. Hell, I never was sure what qualified for that other thread anyway.

And no, I'm not bitching about -- nor have I reported -- the videos here ;)
I was jus' asking a random question (while waiting on emails needed in order to get back to work).

Dumb question but hey ... what purpose is the "What Are You YouTubing Of Late" thread if this one gets video?

Presumably the answer is "none", but I thought there might be some distinction I missed somewhere. Hell, I never was sure what qualified for that other thread anyway.

And no, I'm not bitching about -- nor have I reported -- the videos here ;)
I was jus' asking a random question (while waiting on emails needed in order to get back to work).

Subby asked the question on the story behind the animated gif I posted, only thing I could find quickly was the video of the story...hence I posted it. If It was something I found while perusing Youtube, I would have posted in that thread :):p

and look at Subby getting me in trouble ;)

Subby asked the question on the story behind the animated gif I posted, only thing I could find quickly was the video of the story...hence I posted it. If It was something I found while perusing Youtube, I would have posted in that thread :):p

I was really confused by your answer ... until I realized that the original appearance was actually an animated gif instead of a video.

Too easy. :D

Subby asked the question on the story behind the animated gif I posted, only thing I could find quickly was the video of the story...hence I posted it. If It was something I found while perusing Youtube, I would have posted in that thread :):p

and look at Subby getting me in trouble ;)
My guess is Jon has me on ignore, so he probably didn't see my original request.

Dumb question but hey ... what purpose is the "What Are You YouTubing Of Late" thread if this one gets video?

Presumably the answer is "none", but I thought there might be some distinction I missed somewhere. Hell, I never was sure what qualified for that other thread anyway.

And no, I'm not bitching about -- nor have I reported -- the videos here ;)
I was jus' asking a random question (while waiting on emails needed in order to get back to work).

Hey, I've bitched when people have posted cartoons in here, so I'm with ya.

An American hero.

It is ironic that for quite a while, QS was enforcing the rule that the top of the page must contain a prurient photo, which i didn't go along with. I wonder if operation sports started clamping down?

My guess is Jon has me on ignore, so he probably didn't see my original request.

Eh, your question was irrelevant to my question. I was off base from the get-go because (with it on a different page than the video reply) I was thinking that the original post of it was a video itself.

Eh, your question was irrelevant to my question. I was off base from the get-go because (with it on a different page than the video reply) I was thinking that the original post of it was a video itself.
Well, I feel better at least.

If I perceive that the primary reason for posting the pic is "ZOMFG LOOK HOW HAWT SHE LOOKS," then it's gone. As I said pages and pages ago in this thread:

"Just don't post anything remotely prurient, and you won't have any problems."


*sigh* Ben, time and time again people have told you the real problem. Clarity. Your the admin/main mod/gurugod/whatever the fuck, fine run with it, but with that title comes a responsibility to the group/community as a WHOLE (not just to your insider friends and/or mods) to specify WHY you do things and WHY you take actions.

You jump the shark on photos in THIS thread, but the HOt or Not threads have far more risque images and they were being run for years.

If you want a forum where the only people around to post are Christian thinking overly prudish and agree with you regularly then this board is dead.

I came here over a decade ago and found a haven of ALL types of people. We had something in common, unfortunately for us that common ground is dead and buried as well. (or might as well be)

If this community is going to live on with more than a baker's dozen of active posters you can't stomp everything flat that falls outside your personal views of what is right good and proper. This board is not YOU, it has never been YOU and to survive must never be YOU. it must be everyone, sharing and acting alike and trusting in the people in charge to be fair evenhanded AND Explanatory.

If you can't or refuse to do that then you need to rethink your own role here. For the good of the community.


Damnit man stop making me sound like an adult. Fucking hell.

:popcorn:

I think Ben is causing himself WAY more trouble than he needs to in this case. I've been a mod before on three other boards with far more members than this one. Anytime a mod deleted a post, an automated message was generated giving the specific rule being broken that triggered removal. The poster knew immediately why it was removed (didn't have to like it necessarily), but it was clear what had occurred.

Perhaps OS doesn't have this tool. If they don't, they really should create it in a hurry.

You jump the shark on photos in THIS thread, but the HOt or Not threads have far more risque images and they were being run for years.

I think the difference is in the point of the threads. The HoN threads are suppose to be about hot women as where this is about images we find to be cool.

I had a post of a hot girl removed. She was fully clothed and other than having curves, she was wearing a shirt and jeans and it was removed. Too hot?

I think the difference is in the point of the threads. The HoN threads are suppose to be about hot women as where this is about images we find to be cool.


and I would agree with that, however many people find images with hot women in them to BE cool. Then there is the point that images of naked men and or appendages are left here. Are they cool?

The point being one single person cannot dictate that to the community. One opinion doesn't make a standard.

What Ben considers "pushing the limits" is a very broad spectrum and is stated that way so he can simply say "its been explained" and walk away from his responsibility as the Moderator.

If its not worth his "time" as he says to do his job properly, then he needs to step back and take on a different role here. He's not doing anyone any good doing a half assed job.

Page 375 pretty much sinks Ben's standard as well. Again, it is inconsistent as hell even when we understand the standard.

I think someone enjoys power a little too much.

Render, he doesn't like you or me or many other people since we do not create content he is interested in, esp. for those he needs to babysit because they insist on turning this site into a soft porn one (which is likely against the hosting rules).

Y'know the one deleted pic that stands out as making no sense to me whatsoever?

The one with the fairly hot chick (fully clothed) standing next to the wacky looking dude that's apparently some sort of high-roller or something. That seemed a lot more "hey, look what money will get ya" than prurient afaic.

(somebody will know the one I'm talking about and describe it better, I think it was shot at an NBA game or something like that)

http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web03/2011/10/26/15/enhanced-buzz-wide-17090-1319658124-77.jpg

If ya squint, that last pic kinda looks like boobs (or at least one boob).

http://s1.ibtimes.com/sites/www.ibtimes.com/files/styles/v2_article_large/public/2013/04/08/wm29_photo_210.jpg

If ya squint, that last pic kinda looks like boobs (or at least one boob).


See now THIS is what I see as the problem at its roots.

Ben WANTS to see something wrong with pretty much any photo he gets told about or sees for himself. Which leads to eliminating perfectly innocent photos which are safe on pretty much EVERY website (golfers for frakks sake??) I believe he goes into every interaction here in recent years with a predisposition to the negative instead of taking a rational appraisal for himself because "its not worth his time" to actually think a situation through.

http://s1.ibtimes.com/sites/www.ibtimes.com/files/styles/v2_article_large/public/2013/04/08/wm29_photo_210.jpg


See now I find this pic more offensive than tons of others because I find the entire wrestling "thing" to be offensive to anyone with a brain.

Around page 350 I had a pick of a beef Wellington and face-only shot of Megan Fox removed. Beef tenderloin wrapped in pastry and a face of a beautiful girl???

See now I find this pic more offensive than tons of others because I find the entire wrestling "thing" to be offensive to anyone with a brain.

But see, that statement is in & of itself offensive to a fair number of people.

But see, that statement is in & of itself offensive to a fair number of people.


EXACTLY! See no one person can declare what is "acceptable" because we all have differing views!


Those people you talk about here are wrong of course, but hey its all good ;)

There's probably only one solution, ban us all.

See now THIS is what I see as the problem at its roots.

Ben WANTS to see something wrong with pretty much any photo he gets told about or sees for himself. Which leads to eliminating perfectly innocent photos which are safe on pretty much EVERY website (golfers for frakks sake??) I believe he goes into every interaction here in recent years with a predisposition to the negative instead of taking a rational appraisal for himself because "its not worth his time" to actually think a situation through.

I think Ben has already thought the situation through. Frequent posters in this thread keep trying to find the line of the hottest picture they can find that won't be deleted. Once that line is determined, they will push just a little bit farther and then demand an explanation of why one was OK but the other wasn't. Ben looks to be deleting pictures that attempt to define that line so people will eventually stop the definition and escalation cycle.

It is rather impressive how much stubbornness is on display in this thread.

Is it a reading comprehension issue?

1. Risqué pictures can lead to some members being banned from visiting here by their employer.
2. Non-risqué pictures hosted on certain sites can lead to some members being banned from visiting here by their employer.
3. Ben (and/or other mods) WILL remove anything that even approaches either of these two rules that he sees, in an effort to preserve every person's privilege to post/view here.
4. The mods don't have nearly enough time to check every post ever made on this forum, therefore not every picture gets immediately deleted.

This seems neither draconian nor hard to understand. I think I must be missing something regarding the massive outrage here.

I think Ben has already thought the situation through. Frequent posters in this thread keep trying to find the line of the hottest picture they can find that won't be deleted. Once that line is determined, they will push just a little bit farther and then demand an explanation of why one was OK but the other wasn't. Ben looks to be deleting pictures that attempt to define that line so people will eventually stop the definition and escalation cycle.

It is rather impressive how much stubbornness is on display in this thread.

Yes it is puzzling how juvenile the "resistance" becomes on this issue. Every picture of women on the last two pages were obviously posted to test where the line is. The only reason that the issue seems to get popular support from the "anti Ben" crowd is because most of the board doesn't give a shit or post in this thread.

The moderations and bannings are very inconsistant but I remember my dad talking to me after I got in trouble with a substitute when I was in junior high. I said that I really didn't do anything and other kids were doing more. He said that a sub isn't going to go out of their way if you are doing nothing so just don't do anything and you won't get in trouble. Seems pretty sensible doesn't it?

Or you can post a half naked chick that is available all over the internet, get banned or leave FOFC, and then in 6 months realize life goes on at FOFC and nobody really cares about your Ghandi-like stand that you took.

1. Risqué pictures can lead to some members being banned from visiting here by their employer.
2. Non-risqué pictures hosted on certain sites can lead to some members being banned from visiting here by their employer.


And this is almost certainly one of the most significant annoyances about the whole tempest in a teapot.

That seems like it ought to fall under the category of "your problem" (the royal "you" in this case) rather than "everyone's problem". And having other people's problems rain on someone's fun is often less than popular.

Are there seriously that many people whose boss would be fine with them bullshitting on a video game forum on company time but would consider a stray bikini a major offense? Srsly?

If so, no wonder this country is so f'ed up.

(and I don't even particularly give a flying rat's ass about the pics themselves but this is all getting rather absurd)

Yes, both you and Brian are missing the part where its neither well thought through or even given a seconds consideration.

The real issue isn't the posts themselves, as MANY peole have stated OVER and OVER again.

The issue is the person or persons who are deleting things and boxing people aren't giving to seconds of honest thought to the situation because "its not worth their time".

That statement on its own merits should disqualify ANYONE from being a moderator. If you want to moderate a board (which I do, in several places) then you have to give the TIME that the job requires. I've given up modding position several times including one with the HFL here because I simply didn't have the time to do the job properly and fairly.

You have to stop falling back on an argument no one is making. The community needs, and DESERVES moderators who have the time and the obvious interest to do the job properly. And no matter how many times Ben repeats "Its been explain" that doesn't mean you simply delte and box and whatever else to the active users without SOME SORT of explanation as to why. Even if it is cutting and pasting "rule number 235000 was broken".

Its that LACK clarity that causes 99.99% of the drama.

+10000 to Jon's post.

Too much jibber jabber

http://www.straitpinkie.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/dubailadiesmastersdaythreeav-fdbhydagl.jpg

Too much jibber jabber

http://www.straitpinkie.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/dubailadiesmastersdaythreeav-fdbhydagl.jpg

I'd like to jibber her jabber.

You have to stop falling back on an argument no one is making. The community needs, and DESERVES moderators who have the time and the obvious interest to do the job properly.

I don't think it's unfair to ask "why"? And by that I mean "why do you believe they 'deserve' those?"

As long as those users are content to come under the current conditions (for the sake of discussion let's just stipulate that management is largely disinterested) then, well, we get the form of government we "deserve".

I suspect that - for both mods & users - there's no small percentage of people who would actually consider the eventual demise of FOFC as much a relief as anything.

Is it a reading comprehension issue?

1. Risqué pictures can lead to some members being banned from visiting here by their employer.


The problem is, what is risqué? Is a photo from the superbowl halftime show or a olympic hurdler warming up that were both shown on network tv risqué? Sure there are a few people here that like toeing the line, but I think most of us are confused as to what state the line is even in. How about a pic of fighter plane? Is that machine designed to kill people risqué? How about roadkill? Is a picture of Michael Phelps in a swimsuit risqué? How about Kate Upton in a swimsuit?

The community just seems to be asking for consistency and some communication when things need to be removed. If the moderators do not have the time or ability to provide that, then I think the choices are either to get new moderators or slowly watch the community die.

Obviously people enjoy coming here, otherwise the exodus from this board would be quick and silent.

The why is pretty simple really. its what the job of a moderator entails. The difference between thriving communities and failing ones is directly the management.

As for the eventual demise I have to agree, its probably going to die a low death anyway. I still take umbrage with the management either directly or through disinterest causing that demise any sooner that absolutely necessary.

The other issue being that the community on the whole has no say what so ever in the management "government" so we cannot "deserve" what we get as we had so say in creating or affecting it.

ANyway, someone post some cool pictures. I'm tired of typing today.

http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/
http://www.reddit.com/r/funny
http://www.reddit.com/r/EarthPorn

that should about cover this thread

The problem is, what is risqué? Is a photo from the superbowl halftime show or a olympic hurdler warming up that were both shown on network tv risqué? Sure there are a few people here that like toeing the line, but I think most of us are confused as to what state the line is even in. How about a pic of fighter plane? Is that machine designed to kill people risqué? How about roadkill? Is a picture of Michael Phelps in a swimsuit risqué? How about Kate Upton in a swimsuit?

The community just seems to be asking for consistency and some communication when things need to be removed. If the moderators do not have the time or ability to provide that, then I think the choices are either to get new moderators or slowly watch the community die.

Obviously people enjoy coming here, otherwise the exodus from this board would be quick and silent.


++++++++

Merriam - Webster defines prurient as ": marked by or arousing an immoderate or unwholesome interest or desire; especially : marked by, arousing, or appealing to sexual desire "

By that definition & the admonition we got earlier, I'm guessing that bikini pics of Dr. Ruth, Kathy Griffin and Hillary Clinton are okay. And maybe Kathy Bates.

Beyond that, I guess it's poster beware.

Merriam - Webster defines prurient as ": marked by or arousing an immoderate or unwholesome interest or desire; especially : marked by, arousing, or appealing to sexual desire "


I only get that way looking at pics of Pumpy, so I can basically get an exception to post anything but Pumpy pics I assume?

Perhaps the main failing is attempting to remove prurience entirely because everyone desires different things. Just because Ben doesn't lust after kathy bates doesn't mean others don't.

You can't legislate morality. If the Right wing in our government would learn that maybe it would "trickle down"

Are there seriously that many people whose boss would be fine with them bullshitting on a video game forum on company time but would consider a stray bikini a major offense? Srsly?

If so, no wonder this country is so f'ed up.

I endorse this thought.

I work at home and have my personal rig next to my work rig, I only come here on break time from home and never on my work computer, whether home or in the office.

I never understood the justification of getting paid to fuck around on the net while I am on the clock.

The problem is, what is risqué?

I actually DON'T think this is the problem, and I think that's the disconnect between the two sides. There is no 'line.' If someone has a problem with something and it's reported, it's gone. No questions asked.

Whether or not an employer wants someone to be browsing an Internet forum or not on their own time is irrelevant. As Ben mentioned, the majority of the traffic on the site (by a huge margin) is driven during work hours. Things that eliminate users' abilities to post during that time are no bueno. Ergo, no line.

I get all of the arguments about inconsistency and the definition of risque, but at the same time, I have not been surprised by one picture deletion or boxing that has resulted from them. If we are all honest with ourselves, I'd bet that the people posting the pictured that get deleted know then will get deleted. I wouldn't argue against having a reason posted, but I am quite sure that won't give me any information I didn't already have.

"No questions asked?"

Nice...so if I report post #18895 it'll be removed no matter what?

So, if a gay dude posts the bikini pics, we're okay.

Subby, continue posting your golfer pics.

MG, if you report the dog humping pic and say you are turned on by it, then they will remove it.

The picture I posted of Rock and Cena has less clothing in it then any of the others. Hopefully I didn't cross a line.

Risque = something I scramble to scroll past and hope my wife/son/daughter didn't notice as to ask "uh, what is that you're looking at?"

like post #3

It doesn't matter to me if the rule is to ban all pictures, animated gifs and videos. We can live without them here.

My issue is that the moderators are not part of this community and are lazy/detached in their duties and responsibilities. You earn trust not by your title but by your leadership. If the moderators would rather not spend any time here or feel the only have to come here to deservedly discipline a child, then that's not the definition of a forum moderator as others with experience have stated.

So, if a gay dude posts the bikini pics, we're okay.

Subby, continue posting your golfer pics.
Sorry. I went through revrew's gay therapy program and am now cured of gay.

Sorry. I went through revrew's gay therapy program and am now cured of gay.

Can you post male golfer pics then?

Stop causing problems.

Stop causing problems.

Zip it. You're banned already.

Not anymore!

http://img248.exs.cx/img248/2190/wrestle1hp.jpg

For posterity

Hmmm. Must. Stop. Prurient. Interest. PUMP. IT. PUMPY.

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/529391_366052146840938_791198355_n.jpg

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/544584_366630913449728_1101998727_n.jpg

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/388699_366493000130186_1132840937_n.jpg

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/525451_366470413465778_406298903_n.jpg

MG, if you report the dog humping pic and say you are turned on by it, then they will remove it.

I'm not gonna lie, I'm totally turned on by it.

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/59747_363458217100331_1804943288_n.jpg

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/45348_364681176978035_465756088_n.jpg

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/644286_365163080263178_338586629_n.jpg

Can you post male golfer pics then?

Sure you can. See?

http://answers.bettor.com/images/Articles/thumbs/extralarge/2010_9_6-2010_9_6_5_51_49-JPG-25653.JPG

Sorry. I went through revrew's gay therapy program and am now cured of gay.

Lol

A couple of thoughts.

I'm not saying I agree or disagree with anyone's argument, but if you post a picture that is remotely risqué and get boxes that is your own fault. The precedent has been set for a while now.

My other thought is am I the only one here who hasn't ever moderated a message board?

A couple of thoughts.

I'm not saying I agree or disagree with anyone's argument, but if you post a picture that is remotely risqué and get boxes that is your own fault. The precedent has been set for a while now.

My other thought is am I the only one here who hasn't ever moderated a message board?

nope,.

If I perceive that the primary reason for posting the pic is "ZOMFG LOOK HOW HAWT SHE LOOKS," then it's gone. As I said pages and pages ago in this thread:

"Just don't post anything remotely prurient, and you won't have any problems."

It is ironic that for quite a while, QS was enforcing the rule that the top of the page must contain a prurient photo, which i didn't go along with. I wonder if operation sports started clamping down?

Merriam - Webster defines prurient as ": marked by or arousing an immoderate or unwholesome interest or desire; especially : marked by, arousing, or appealing to sexual desire "

By that definition & the admonition we got earlier, I'm guessing that bikini pics of Dr. Ruth, Kathy Griffin and Hillary Clinton are okay. And maybe Kathy Bates.

Beyond that, I guess it's poster beware.


Thanks, Jon. I'm actually serious that I would have to go look up what prurient meant :D

SI

Are there seriously that many people whose boss would be fine with them bullshitting on a video game forum on company time but would consider a stray bikini a major offense? Srsly?

If it's during your lunch time, then bullshitting on a forum would be allowed, but looking at pics of lovely women in a bikini could create the work environment that is impacting others. (stray female walking by, for example).

If you find a stray female, you should take her home.

I am semi-back.

Any picture that I perceive to be an attempt to push the limits I have written in the sticky will be deleted, likely without further explanation. I have deleted several. It has already been explained and I, for one, am not willing to waste words saying the same thing over again. If you want action taken for pictures in this or another thread, just report the post and an evaluation will be made.

Bottom line: don't try to push the limit on "hawt chix" posts, and you won't get suspended. Push it, and you might. It's really that simple. And it's not up for discussion. In the time I have been away, some people have gotten away with some things that shouldn't have happened. So be it. But know that further complaining, sarcasm, whining, attempting to push the limits, or other jerk-ish behavior around this policy, either in this thread or elsewhere, will result in punitive measures.

You forgot "further joking around will not be tolerated".

If you find a stray female, you should take her home.

I was thinking the same thing. At least take the time to say 'Hi!'.

If you find a stray female, you should take her home.

Control the pet population.

Ya know, sure there are pictures in this thread that are all about "look at her boobs and look at her butt", but really, a majority of the pictures of females posted are genuinely beautiful. And I get that we're all probably popping boners to one degree or another but it's kind of sad that a community of adults can't just share and discuss pictures of women or that they're somehow viewed as more vulgar than any of the other types of pictures posted. I can go to TheHun and see tons of great pictures of nude women but there is a real level of quality to a lot of the pictures posted here that are A) Not Pornographic and B) Quite a remarkable level of female beauty.

I have a point, but I'm prone to rambling.

I can go to ________ and see tons of great pictures

Doing a bit of editing there to pose a question - do we really need a thread here to be a pic aggregator where posters go on repost sprees from "reallycoolfractals.com" or "totallyphotoshoppedlandscapes.net" or People of Walmart or "awfulalbumcovers.us" or "catsandcleavage.edu"? That's what most of this is, really, and while it was entertaining at first, I'm not sure it serves much of a purpose.

Doing a bit of editing there to pose a question - do we really need a thread here to be a pic aggregator where posters go on repost sprees from "reallycoolfractals.com" or "totallyphotoshoppedlandscapes.net" or People of Walmart or "awfulalbumcovers.us" or "catsandcleavage.edu"? That's what most of this is, really, and while it was entertaining at first, I'm not sure it serves much of a purpose.

This post is a resource all by itself. Who knew there were such sites?

Do we need to be the place to post about sports seasons or events, books, television shows, movies we've seen, video games, events in our personal lives, fantasy sports, strange news stories, current events, dead celebrities, child molesters, what beer we're drinking and music we're listening to? I can go elsewhere on the web and find all those things.

Doing a bit of editing there to pose a question - do we really need a thread here to be a pic aggregator where posters go on repost sprees from "reallycoolfractals.com" or "totallyphotoshoppedlandscapes.net" or People of Walmart or "awfulalbumcovers.us" or "catsandcleavage.edu"? That's what most of this is, really, and while it was entertaining at first, I'm not sure it serves much of a purpose.

I think it's great. I don't scour the internet, there are two main sites I go to. The fact that I can come here and talk about sports, tv, music and politics AND see some cool pictures that I wouldn't have seen is really nice.

That being said, of course anyone posting pics should know by now what's going to happen and the complaining is very silly at this point.

Or what McKerney said

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/529391_366052146840938_791198355_n.jpg
Justin Timberlake plays the saxophone? Man, is there anything he can't do?

Do we need to be the place to post about sports seasons or events, books, television shows, movies we've seen, video games, events in our personal lives, fantasy sports, strange news stories, current events, dead celebrities, child molesters, what beer we're drinking and music we're listening to? I can go elsewhere on the web and find all those things.

+++

Bill Paxton on the left. Coolest band ever.

http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/45348_364681176978035_465756088_n.jpg
I don't think Jesus is enjoying their touch.

MBFF: re: Merrill Womach

Dude survived a horrific plane crash & fire. I think that has to get him a pass for his appearance under the circumstances.

He even had his 15 minutes of fame back in the 80s.
Brutally Burned in a Plane Crash, Merrill Womach Lives to Sing the Praises of the Lord : People.com (http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20079847,00.html)

Y'know the one deleted pic that stands out as making no sense to me whatsoever?

The one with the fairly hot chick (fully clothed) standing next to the wacky looking dude that's apparently some sort of high-roller or something. That seemed a lot more "hey, look what money will get ya" than prurient afaic.

(somebody will know the one I'm talking about and describe it better, I think it was shot at an NBA game or something like that)

Buck (?) Goldstein and some Danish model, I think it was.

As if last night wasn't enough...


http://www.cbssports.com/images/collegefootball/denardfirstpitch.gif

Yeah, my point in posting that was entirely the funny juxtaposition, and I think the 2 cents I added made that entirely clear.

The reality is that any photo of woman with the slightest bit of skin showing above the knee, around the stomach or in the vicinity of her breasts, is going to be deleted, which is just lazy heavy handedness. But again, nothing that shouldn't be expected at this point.

As if last night wasn't enough...


http://www.cbssports.com/images/collegefootball/denardfirstpitch.gif

I wish the guy well. Heck, he made some incredible plays over the last few seasons. I think he's a good person, too, and will work hard enough to become a success in the NFL as a slot or a specialist.

But I laughed anyway.

I wish the guy well. Heck, he made some incredible plays over the last few seasons. I think he's a good person, too, and will work hard enough to become a success in the NFL as a slot or a specialist.

But I laughed anyway.

Me too. I am a huge fan. Sure, he had plenty of shortcomings as a QB, but he was such a joy to watch on Saturdays. Never been a player on Michigan quite like him.

As if last night wasn't enough...


http://www.cbssports.com/images/collegefootball/denardfirstpitch.gif

Wow, his arm has improved while training for combine

Is it a reading comprehension issue?
It's a comprehension issue, not a reading comprehension issue.
1. Risqué pictures can lead to some members being banned from visiting here by their employer.
FALSE: There are numerous other threads that contain risque pictures. For reasons that have not yet been fully explained, this thread is one in which this rule is enforced. It is very easy to find other threads which are advertised clearly as having risque photos that have not been censored. If members are banned from visiting here by their employer, it is more likely that the employer doesn't want their employees jacking around on a message board when they should be working.
2. Non-risqué pictures hosted on certain sites can lead to some members being banned from visiting here by their employer.
FALSE. If anyone bothered to notice, the domain for this site is Operation Sports | Madden NFL 13 | NCAA Football 13 | NBA 2K13 | MLB 13 The Show (http://www.operationsports.com). Very few if any automated programs will prohibit access to a subfolder but allow access to the main folder. This site is judged by content across OperationSports.com. Unless this policy is enforced across all OS forums (which it clearly is not), then any images hosted on certain sites on any OS page would impact the viewing of FOFC.
3. Ben (and/or other mods) WILL remove anything that even approaches either of these two rules that he sees, in an effort to preserve every person's privilege to post/view here.
FALSE. If you can't find risque images in other threads, you're not looking hard enough.
4. The mods don't have nearly enough time to check every post ever made on this forum, therefore not every picture gets immediately deleted.
FALSE. Many threads are clearly advertised as having risque photos and have widespread moderation participation. Posters in this thread were at one time admonished by a well respected moderator for NOT posting a risque photo.
This seems neither draconian nor hard to understand. I think I must be missing something regarding the massive outrage here.
No one says it's draconian, it's just stupid and arbitrary. Here are the real truths:

1. If the moderators wish to increase transparency, create a stickied, closed thread in the Off-Topic forum that posts each reported post. Right now, most members assume the reportings are fictional or from misinformed members who don't understand how Internet filtering software works.

2. If you are blocked from FOFC or fear you may be blocked from FOFC, it is likely due to the fact that your employer wants you working and not jacking off on the Internet. I've worked for a company that blocked Facebook and other social networking sites. If your goal is to circumvent your employer's desire that you work while using their Internet, computer and other resources on your job, you're not exactly occupying a moral high ground.

3. If you are fearful your employer may see you viewing inappropriate content by view a thread, answer this: do you think your employer would approve of you viewing the text of this forum while working?

Anytime someone argues that a picture of a female golfer is going to lead to this forum being blocked by Internet filters has a fundamental lack of knowledge of how the Internet works.

It doesn't matter to me if the rule is to ban all pictures, animated gifs and videos. We can live without them here.

My issue is that the moderators are not part of this community and are lazy/detached in their duties and responsibilities. You earn trust not by your title but by your leadership. If the moderators would rather not spend any time here or feel the only have to come here to deservedly discipline a child, then that's not the definition of a forum moderator as others with experience have stated.

It's a comprehension issue, not a reading comprehension issue.

FALSE: There are numerous other threads that contain risque pictures. For reasons that have not yet been fully explained, this thread is one in which this rule is enforced. It is very easy to find other threads which are advertised clearly as having risque photos that have not been censored. If members are banned from visiting her by their employer, is more likely than the employer doesn't want their employees jacking around on a message board when they should be working.

FALSE. If anyone bothered to notice, the domain for this site is Operation Sports | Madden NFL 13 | NCAA Football 13 | NBA 2K13 | MLB 13 The Show (http://www.operationsports.com). Very few if any automated programs will prohibit access to a subfolder but allow access to the main folder. This site is judged by content across OperationSports.com. Unless this policy is enforced across all OS forums (which it clearly is not), then any images hosted on certain sites on any OS page would impact the viewing of FOFC.

FALSE. If you can't find risque images in other threads, you're not looking hard enough.

FALSE. Many threads are clearly advertised as having risque photos and have widespread moderation participation. Posters in this thread were at one time admonished by a well respected moderator for NOT posting a risque photo.

No one says it's draconian, it's just stupid and arbitrary. Here are the real truths:

1. If the moderators wish to increase transparency, create a stickied, closed thread in the Off-Topic forum that posts each reported post. Right now, most members assume the reportings are fictional or from misinformed members who don't understand how Internet filtering software works.

2. If you are blocked from FOFC or fear you may be blocked from FOFC, it is likely due to the fact that you're employer wants you working and not jacking off on the Internet. I've worked for a company that blocked Facebook and other social networking sites. If you're goal is circumvent your employer's desire that your work while using their Internet, computer and other resources on your job, you're not exactly occupying a moral high ground.

3. If you are fearful your employer may see you viewing inappropriate content by view a thread, answer this: do you think your employer would approve of you viewing the text of this forum while working?

Anytime someone argues that a picture of a female golfer is going to lead to this forum being blocked by Internet filters has a fundamental lack of knowledge of how the Internet works.

I like both of these posts.

Buck (?) Goldstein and some Danish model, I think it was.

Close enough. Turns out that it's James (or Jim).

The pic in question, btw, is featured in the article on him that appears at noted trashy site Yahoo.com, and is also the first image associated with his name on Google (with SafeSearch on)

As if last night wasn't enough...


http://www.cbssports.com/images/collegefootball/denardfirstpitch.gif

Wow, his arm has improved while training for combine

:lol:

It doesn't matter to me if the rule is to ban all pictures, animated gifs and videos. We can live without them here.

My issue is that the moderators are not part of this community and are lazy/detached in their duties and responsibilities. You earn trust not by your title but by your leadership. If the moderators would rather not spend any time here or feel the only have to come here to deservedly discipline a child, then that's not the definition of a forum moderator as others with experience have stated.

Bucc, I don't think that is the case. I think the time spent may vary by mod, but I think most hours of the day you'll find one or more here. (Granted, the last week is an exception for Ben given his new arrival.)

What I think is true is that none of us read every single thread, and I think that accounts for some inconsistencies. At some point you have to rely on the community for things like post reports. And, I think the community does a pretty good job of that. For the most part, things work well and but for people's complaints about this thread (or differences between this thread and others) the board is modded pretty consistently. I will say there is likely one exception and that is that posters who have "earned their stripes" may get a longer leash than newer posters. In part, that's human nature. In part, though it is because there are other ways to reach those posters.

I will use Subby as an example. I communicate with Subby in variety of ways off the board. On more than one occasion, I've sent him an e-mail or a note somewhere else to tell him to cool his jets. He has always done so. People may not like that or think it shows favoritism or whatever, but that's just the nature of the beast.

People seem to doubt what I wrote yesterday about the number of posts reported or think that there is some hiding of the ball there. There really isn't. I will try to post (while protecting anonymity) a summary of reported posts on a regular basis if that is something people would like. I think you will be underwhelmed.

digamma, thank you for the clarification. Perhaps there could be some regulars here that could be added to the moderator's pool to replace those that do not frequent the boards much anymore?

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m6ibkkut641qclcbeo1_500.png

For the record, I can't fix the quoted text, but I'm ashamed at the misuse of "you're" in my post above. I know better ... I write for a freakin' living, that's a huge pet peeve. I don't know what type of phasia caused that.

Hey guys, anyone in the Cleveland area that wants to grab a coffee, PM me-

Which version of guitar hero do you have?

Which version of guitar hero do you have?

yessir

Hey guys, anyone in the Cleveland area that wants to grab a coffee, PM me-

"Sure, I could buy pants and whatever, but then I wouldn't have as many guns and guitars."

You know, the REALLY disturbing thing is that there had to be someone else there to take the picture. Then, of course, it puts the picture and the lotion in the bucket. {shivers}

x

Oh my god, lol, this is a local band that my friend and I joke about all the time. Their MySpace is priceless.

Wow

Oh my god, lol, this is a local band that my friend and I joke about all the time. Their MySpace is priceless.

MySpace? Lol.

Close enough. Turns out that it's James (or Jim).

The pic in question, btw, is featured in the article on him that appears at noted trashy site Yahoo.com, and is also the first image associated with his name on Google (with SafeSearch on)

Ha. Buck would be the name of a professor in my undergraduate department...

http://i.imgur.com/5vc02.jpg

Intercourse with anyone who tells me that photo isn't a work of art.

Oh my god, lol, this is a local band that my friend and I joke about all the time. Their MySpace is priceless.

Are they some sort of extra large Misfits tribute band? I totally approve.

http://i.imgur.com/wFijyf4.jpg
ser piggy

It took me a second to figure out who all those people were, and now I hate him and his character even more.

{pic removed}
You realize you're asking to get boxed, right?

Insert every possible golf innuendo here for what I would do to this chick.

I'd totally take a mulligan after missing her fairway.

http://i.imgur.com/wFijyf4.jpg
ser piggy


Sansa seems really tall by that pic.

Sansa seems really tall by that pic.


Seriously, its like they ugly her up for the show??? Margery on the other hand...oh my lordy the things I want to let that girl do to me =)

Insert every possible golf innuendo here for what I would do to this chick.

Lay up short?

Sansa seems really tall by that pic.

Even more terrifying is the fact she's only 17.

I am semi-back.

Any picture that I perceive to be an attempt to push the limits I have written in the sticky will be deleted, likely without further explanation. I have deleted several. It has already been explained and I, for one, am not willing to waste words saying the same thing over again. If you want action taken for pictures in this or another thread, just report the post and an evaluation will be made.

Bottom line: don't try to push the limit on "hawt chix" posts, and you won't get suspended. Push it, and you might. It's really that simple. And it's not up for discussion. In the time I have been away, some people have gotten away with some things that shouldn't have happened. So be it. But know that further complaining, sarcasm, whining, attempting to push the limits, or other jerk-ish behavior around this policy, either in this thread or elsewhere, will result in punitive measures.

You realize you're asking to get boxed, right?Yeah...pretty obvious one there.

One clarification that is apparently still necessary despite it being policy for at least 8 1/2 years, maybe more:3. Please be careful about posting pictures in a thread, even if they are pictures from a legit site like ESPN. Think of the FOFCer who is surfing sitting at the desk at his office.*

*--And before you say, "Well, they shouldn't be surfing at work," consider that there are those who are allowed to surf the 'net during "down-times" at work, but if someone walks by and there's a picture of a woman in a bikini/underwear/skimpy clothes, they may get called into question.
It has nothing to do with my personal morality or even my personal situation. (I work from home.) My opinion on this matter hasn't changed in dang near a decade, and isn't going to change. You're wasting your time arguing on that point.

It actually goes even further in that someone does not have to see them but the network snoopers can automatically. Ten years ago someone posted a regular picture from a link to a questionable site, which got flagged and me in trouble.

Sansa seems really tall by that pic.

Googled and she seems to be 5'9".

For the record, I can't fix the quoted text, but I'm ashamed at the misuse of "you're" in my post above. I know better ... I write for a freakin' living, that's a huge pet peeve. I don't know what type of phasia caused that.
Not a huge deal other than invalidating you're entire argument.

It actually goes even further in that someone does not have to see them but the network snoopers can automatically. Ten years ago someone posted a regular picture from a link to a questionable site, which got flagged and me in trouble.Correct. I didn't get into that piece of it as I don't think anyone has been arguing against that particular component lately. But that's also mentioned in the policy. It's been a long time (~10 years) since that piece first came on my radar, so I don't recall all the specifics and individuals, but it sounds familiar that you were one of the people who caused me to make the original post in late 2003 that is heavily quoted in the current sticky:

*PLEASE* Read This: FOFC Linking Policy. - Front Office Football Central (http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/showthread.php?t=18894)

I love Natlie Dormer. Too bad her hot or not was such a bust :(

So, when I was a kid, there was only 1 place to really play basketball (unless we wanted to hike a dozen miles to the school). The hoop was in this one kids driveway.

The neighborhood kids played alot of football and baseball in the empty lots and whatnot, but if we wanted to play basketball, we had to go to this kids house. Normally, there would be a dozen or so kids that wanted to play basketball games. But, the kid with the hoop (and his couple close buddies) always just wanted to play H.O.R.S.E.

So, the rest of the kids were stuck playing HORSE ... or finding something else to do.

At least he acknowledged boxing Macro there. How long did he get?

I love Natlie Dormer. Too bad her hot or not was such a bust :(

She looks nice there, and I've seen a couple of other pics recently that do her justice. Not your standard "hot", but certainly attractive.

At least he acknowledged boxing Macro there. How long did he get?

he posted on facebook that it was 2 weeks.

http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/web04/2011/10/26/15/enhanced-buzz-wide-2475-1319657077-34.jpg

That looks like a gaping asshole.

BAN HIM

So, when I was a kid, there was only 1 place to really play basketball (unless we wanted to hike a dozen miles to the school). The hoop was in this one kids driveway.

The neighborhood kids played alot of football and baseball in the empty lots and whatnot, but if we wanted to play basketball, we had to go to this kids house. Normally, there would be a dozen or so kids that wanted to play basketball games. But, the kid with the hoop (and his couple close buddies) always just wanted to play H.O.R.S.E.

So, the rest of the kids were stuck playing HORSE ... or finding something else to do.

Can we get Doug boxed for posting this here instead of the appropriate "Random Thoughts" thread? K thx.

Can we get Doug boxed for posting this here instead of the appropriate "Random Thoughts" thread? K thx.

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y293/tromawwf/PunchOut_IntroGlassJoe.jpg

I would like to box Jeeber because I think he's got a glass jaw

SI

I love Natlie Dormer. Too bad her hot or not was such a bust :(

Probably needs more makeup than others to get her looks right. Similar to Mila Kunis.

http://oi46.tinypic.com/rif8nl.jpg

I love Natlie Dormer. Too bad her hot or not was such a bust :(

As I pointed out in that thread, I was sure the numbers would be far more "pro" after her turn on Game of Thrones. People just didn't watch The Tudors that much.

That looks like a gaping asshole.

BAN HIM


Please stop causing problems. K-THX-BAI!

I do love that the same posters who whine about mod trolling then go out and troll Ben.

I do love that the same posters who whine about mod trolling then go out and troll Ben.

Stop trolling the trolls that are trolling the trolls.

Did Macro get boxed for a girl in a golf uniform? LOL

I do love that the same posters who whine about mod trolling then go out and troll Ben.
You just described Chubby's daily workflow!

You just described Chubby's daily workflow!

Subby vs. Chubby! Which ubby will win?!

Subby vs. Chubby! Which ubby will win?!

Build an Ubby - Custom Baby Blankets & Adult Throws (http://www.myubby.com/build/build.php)

One clarification that is apparently still necessary despite it being policy for at least 8 1/2 years, maybe more:It has nothing to do with my personal morality or even my personal situation. (I work from home.) My opinion on this matter hasn't changed in dang near a decade, and isn't going to change. You're wasting your time arguing on that point.

the 99% hasn't changed their opinion in 8 1/2 years either. We don't give a shit about the person at work THAT SHOULD BE WORKING AND NOT SURFING A TEXT SIM MESSAGE BOARD

You just described Chubby's daily workflow!

I actually, ya know, work while I am at work. (novel concept around these parts I know)

Chubby's continued trolling has earned him a couple of weeks in the box.

yet CF gets 3 months...

:banghead:

There's one thing I'm still kind of curious about - does Subby have mod powers to change his username title, or was a mod helping him troll the board?

yet CF gets 3 months...

:banghead:

Yep, gotta agree here.

There's one thing I'm still kind of curious about - does Subby have mod powers to change his username title, or was a mod helping him troll the board?

This

There's one thing I'm still kind of curious about - does Subby have mod powers to change his username title, or was a mod helping him troll the board?
No on both accounts. Stop being curious about me.

No on both accounts. Stop being curious about me.

Why then did you repeatedly post risque photos, soon after show up as "banned", but then continue to post (in the midst of people complaining about your "banning")? I guess the only other possibility is that someone intended to ban you but there was a system bug.

Edit: Earlier, you did explain that it happened because you were "bored at work", so, it was clearly trolling, I'm just wondering how you went about doing it.

http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/showpost.php?p=2808219&postcount=194

Surely no mod would post a personal attack, then delete it

Why then did you repeatedly post risque photos, soon after show up as "banned", but then continue to post (in the midst of people complaining about your "banning")? I guess the only the other possibility is that someone intended to ban you but there was a system bug.
Haha RISQUE.

I posted a picture of a fully clothed golfer and a woman about to run the hurdles doing her pre-race warm up.

Surely no mod would post a personal attack, then delete it
When did that happen?

Between 4:04 and 4:10 EST

Haha RISQUE.

I posted a picture of a fully clothed golfer and a woman about to run the hurdles doing her pre-race warm up.

I didn't think they were risque myself, and they were certainly easy on the eyes, but by the standards of the board, it's the kind of photos that cause problems, and get people in trouble, and you posed several of them right in a row in response to other photos getting taken down. I'm not complaining about consistency, I'm just wondering how you changed your username title to "banned", and why that's such a secret.

http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/showpost.php?p=2808219&postcount=194

Surely no mod would post a personal attack, then delete it

I don't know who deleted it or why, but Jphillips was quoting Mike Rice (without using quote marks). NorvTurner thought Jphillips was calling him a "fu**ing fa***t". Which would be a bit out of character for Jphillips, but when I first saw the post, it did look like an insult for about 2 second before I realized the context. NorvTurner responded and called Jphiliips a "fu**ing retard". And was clearly not quoting Mike Rice. So it was a legit personal attack, though one that started from a misunderstanding.

I didn't think they were risque myself, and they were certainly easy on the eyes, but by the standards of the board, it's the kind of photos that cause problems, and get people in trouble, and you posed several of them right in a row in response to other photos getting taken down. I'm not complaining about consistency, I'm just wondering how you changed your username title to "banned", and why that's such a secret.
I hate the mods just like you. I even joined the FOFC sub reddit to get away from these fuckers. GOD.

http://www.operationsports.com/fofc/showpost.php?p=2808219&postcount=194

Surely no mod would post a personal attack, then delete it

Huh, dunno where that went. I'll say it again then.

"Oh hey, looks like Chubby's back from bagging groceries."

the 99% hasn't changed their opinion in 8 1/2 years either. We don't give a shit about the person at work THAT SHOULD BE WORKING AND NOT SURFING A TEXT SIM MESSAGE BOARD

If you want to talk about killing this message board, let's have everyone stop surfing here while at work.

http://i.imgur.com/nlKVaX8.gif

I hate the mods just like you. I even joined the FOFC sub reddit to get away from these fuckers. GOD.

I don't hate the mods at all, though the one that switched your username title just to get people riled up and to create drama annoys me. I just want there to be as many posters and posts as possible here, that's all.

Isn't this more about "tempting" a certain section of religious posters with pictures while working? I can understand the softcore porn where a girl might be cover her rack with her hands, but a hot girl? When I worked at a job where they monitored the places I went to, I didn't come to FOFC because it wasn't relevant. Now if I worked for a church or a school district or something like that, I wouldn't come here at all during working hours, but I value my job more than posting during work hours. But I'm old fashioned like that.

I hate the mods just like you. I even joined the FOFC sub reddit to get away from these fuckers. GOD.

Aren't you the one who joined a the facebook FOFC group just to tattletale on those who disliked the way it was modded here?

Clear hate.

I don't hate the mods at all, though the one that switched your username title just to get people riled up and to create drama annoys me. I just want there to be as many posters and posts as possible here, that's all.
I take back what I said. I was thinking Chubby was still a mod.

Aren't you the one who joined a the facebook FOFC group just to tattletale on those who disliked the way it was modded here?

Clear hate.
No, I wasn't a member of that group when I posted that hilarious screen shot. Someone who was a member sent it to me.

Just curious... is everyone having a good laugh at all of this in FOBL chat?

Just curious... is everyone having a good laugh at all of this in FOBL chat?
<s>Of course!</s>Never heard of it.

http://www.deviantart.com/download/212223752/cat_moderator__by_armstronger-d3icow8.png

Haha RISQUE.

I posted a picture of a fully clothed golfer and a woman about to run the hurdles doing her pre-race warm up.

And weren't they deleted?

I don't know who deleted it or why, but Jphillips was quoting Mike Rice (without using quote marks). NorvTurner thought Jphillips was calling him a "fu**ing fa***t". Which would be a bit out of character for Jphillips, but when I first saw the post, it did look like an insult for about 2 second before I realized the context. NorvTurner responded and called Jphiliips a "fu**ing retard". And was clearly not quoting Mike Rice. So it was a legit personal attack, though one that started from a misunderstanding.

Didn't know I was involved in any of this mess.

For the record I thought Norv was trying to make an extreme, sarcastic point. I certainly didn't take it as a personal attack.

Just curious... is everyone having a good laugh at all of this in FOBL chat?

Since FOBL is moderating FOFC, maybe FOFC ought to moderate FOBL? :)

whats FOBL?

whats FOBL?
Front Office Banning League.

oh! sounds like fun :)

They're having a banner year!

I don't know who deleted it or why, but Jphillips was quoting Mike Rice (without using quote marks). NorvTurner thought Jphillips was calling him a "fu**ing fa***t". Which would be a bit out of character for Jphillips, but when I first saw the post, it did look like an insult for about 2 second before I realized the context. NorvTurner responded and called Jphiliips a "fu**ing retard". And was clearly not quoting Mike Rice. So it was a legit personal attack, though one that started from a misunderstanding.

I love that for a long time I thought Molson was talking about the real Norv Turner.

whats FOBL?

I don't know but eat my shit, Subby. Okay, thanks.

Subby and molson are at the Bozeman Applebee's if anyone wants to meet up

http://por-img.cimcontent.net/api/assets/bin-201205/2e1c681eb83038b0e3f60ecf084dc453.jpg

If I went gay I would do so much better than Subby.

Damn it, I was in Bozeman just a week ago!

http://i.imgur.com/vAQin.gif

You know, I voted to delete this thread but after seeing that monkey gif I regret that choice.

Is it wrong that I could watch the monkey gif more times than a bouncy girl gif?

I love how the dog briefly chases the monkey, but less than one second later, while the monkey is swinging around the cable, the dog has already lost interest and is looking in another direction. That dog must be totally used to that monkey's antics.

The most risque picture in the last 50 pages was posted by me on page 378...guess there's no problem with almost naked men, but God forbid if we see a picture of a girl golfing! :rolleyes:

That pic by molson is what this thread is all about!

The most risque picture in the last 50 pages was posted by me on page 378...guess there's no problem with almost naked men, but God forbid if we see a picture of a girl golfing! :rolleyes:

Fine. If you're going to continue to complain about it, we'll remove the pic.

Fine. If you're going to continue to complain about it, we'll remove the pic.

Stating facts =/= complaining. Learn the difference.

Stating facts =/= complaining.

Learn the difference.

Fair enough, I thought you had made a comment about it before, but that may not be the case.

That said, posting a pic solely for the purpose of pointing and saying "hey, you'd better delete this!" can be seen as an attempt to provoke, yes?

http://i.imgur.com/nlKVaX8.gif

Dude, that's his daughter. Uncool.

Fair enough, I thought you had made a comment about it before, but that may not be the case.

That said, posting a pic solely for the purpose of pointing and saying "hey, you'd better delete this!" can be seen as an attempt to provoke, yes?

The pic was posted solely for the purpose of pointing out double standards is an attempt to highlight the bafflingly different standards of the moderating in this thread as it relates to pictures of different genders. Men = OK. Women = Verboten. Perhaps by seeing the double standard in such a clear light, it might helpt to advance the discussion to come up with a reasonable, intelligent and consistent moderating standard.

If someone wants to consider that an attempt to provoke, that's certainly within their right to do so. Interpretation is always dependent upon the receiver.

http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002229109/3516712818_can_t_we_all_just_get_along_xlarge.jpeg

That pic by molson is what this thread is all about!

Only if I delete it and get a mod to to change my title to "banned" just for hilarity of the ensuing drama and boxings, THEN that pic will be what this thread is all about!

http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/snake.gif

The pic was posted solely for the purpose of pointing out double standards is an attempt to highlight the bafflingly different standards of the moderating in this thread as it relates to pictures of different genders. Men = OK. Women = Verboten. Perhaps by seeing the double standard in such a clear light, it might helpt to advance the discussion to come up with a reasonable, intelligent and consistent moderating standard.

If someone wants to consider that an attempt to provoke, that's certainly within their right to do so. Interpretation is always dependent upon the receiver.

You off to the United States beaches to rail about topless men after that? The double standard is society not a moderating thing.

At what point did this thread turn into Jezebel, exactly?

That Bozeman pic is Quality.

You off to the United States beaches to rail about topless men after that? The double standard is society not a moderating thing.

Except no one is posting pics of women's tits here. False equivalence is false.

Geez, cartman, how long does your GIF go on?

Did anyone else watch cartman's image from start to finish? :D

And was trying to translate the Russian at the end? :D

And now we .{something}. to you.
{Line I don't know at all}
{something} no. Thank you, all free.

SI

Geez, cartman, how long does your GIF go on?

My screen saver kicked in. It does finish though.

And was trying to translate the Russian at the end? :D

And now we .{something}. to you.
{Line I don't know at all}
{something} no. Thank you, all free.

SI

and now we will show you a cartoon
connection to the server there is no connection
Thank you, all free.

Did anyone else watch cartman's image from start to finish? :D

Absolutely, that was great.