The slip rear hook - Operation Sports Forums

The slip rear hook

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • UFCBlackbelt
    MVP
    • Jan 2018
    • 1067

    #1

    The slip rear hook

    Haven't seen a thread on this even though most players agree its a bit annoying, I won't lie I find myself using it once its used on me.

    The fact that it has such a large invulnerability + major counter damage, callback to duck uppercuts.
    That is can essentially reset your combos.

    Its just too effective imo
  • johnmangala
    MVP
    • Apr 2016
    • 4525

    #2
    Re: The slip rear hook

    Yeah it's a bit op. Altair said they are working on it.

    What I'm surprised more of is that altair said theres nothing wrong with back sitting RNC. I think people on discord are trying to talk him out of that stance well see if it changes.

    Comment

    • UFCBlackbelt
      MVP
      • Jan 2018
      • 1067

      #3
      Re: The slip rear hook

      Originally posted by johnmangala
      Yeah it's a bit op. Altair said they are working on it.

      What I'm surprised more of is that altair said theres nothing wrong with back sitting RNC. I think people on discord are trying to talk him out of that stance well see if it changes.
      I'm fine with backsitting RNC, I'm not fine with the fact that my fighter has no proper response to the backtake against the cage.

      Comment

      • johnmangala
        MVP
        • Apr 2016
        • 4525

        #4
        Re: The slip rear hook

        Originally posted by UFCBlackbelt
        I'm fine with backsitting RNC, I'm not fine with the fact that my fighter has no proper response to the backtake against the cage.
        Which one? The one where they drag you back or the one where they hop onto your back?

        The first one is turn based denial, the other one is high block.

        Comment

        • UFCBlackbelt
          MVP
          • Jan 2018
          • 1067

          #5
          Re: The slip rear hook

          Originally posted by johnmangala
          Which one? The one where they drag you back or the one where they hop onto your back?

          The first one is turn based denial, the other one is high block.
          No, the fact that people can press you against the cage and spam the back take from overunder. Even if you deny they can just retake it and ride the whole round out,

          unless I'm missing something, its weird because I just cant imagine how this makes sense

          Comment

          • johnmangala
            MVP
            • Apr 2016
            • 4525

            #6
            Re: The slip rear hook

            Originally posted by UFCBlackbelt
            No, the fact that people can press you against the cage and spam the back take from overunder. Even if you deny they can just retake it and ride the whole round out,

            unless I'm missing something, its weird because I just cant imagine how this makes sense
            I think the back take from over under should be deniable, I dont like how there are so many undeniable transitions now.

            But that's beside the point you can escape from there too. You just move out and you escape, you can also instant out when you deny the backpack.

            Comment

            • RetractedMonkey
              MVP
              • Dec 2017
              • 1624

              #7
              Re: The slip rear hook

              Originally posted by johnmangala
              I think the back take from over under should be deniable, I dont like how there are so many undeniable transitions now.

              But that's beside the point you can escape from there too. You just move out and you escape, you can also instant out when you deny the backpack.
              It is deniable. There are no undeniable positions.

              The issue isn't whether you can escape them or not, it's the fact that it is so easy to initiate a position where you essentially have a 50/50 chance to end up in an advanced position that will easily end the fight if you make one mistake.

              How many straight up back takes do you see in the UFC? Almost none. And even those are initiated by grapplers. In this game you have every fighter in the game able to easily put someone into back sitting with full stamina, no damage, fight ending RNC capability no matter the ground skills or sub stats.

              Comment

              • johnmangala
                MVP
                • Apr 2016
                • 4525

                #8
                Re: The slip rear hook

                ^

                Wdym there are no undeniable positions? You cant deny single under or single collar and the GNP transitions to other positions. I think you're right you can deny the back take, but only after getting into that position so it's more like transitioning back. I rmb an actual denial (same animation) but I havent been able to do it in a while, could be still in maybe they changed it or something.

                I dont like the 50/50s either, I preferred the denial mechanic of the old clinch from ufc 3. I'm just letting him know you can escape those positions since he made it seem like you cant.

                And yeah I said early in the patch cycle the backpack should be a grappling specialist move. It's odd seeing Tyson Fury hop on someone's back like that. If they wanna keep a way to get to back sitting for all they should use that other back drag to backside or back sitting.

                Also that stats in general should matter way more. But as long as you can knock out Usman with Maia you should be able to sub someone despite similar stat discrepancies. I would like it to be harder tho if they make stats actually matter more, but it should be for both striking and grappling. It's weird seeing Saki be able to sub Jones so easily, same with Maia and Usman for KOs.

                Comment

                • RetractedMonkey
                  MVP
                  • Dec 2017
                  • 1624

                  #9
                  Re: The slip rear hook

                  Originally posted by johnmangala
                  ^

                  Wdym there are no undeniable positions? You cant deny single under or single collar and the GNP transitions to other positions. I think you're right you can deny the back take, but only after getting into that position so it's more like transitioning back. I rmb an actual denial (same animation) but I havent been able to do it in a while, could be still in maybe they changed it or something.
                  I mean there is nothing in the game without a direct counter or something you can do to stop it from even happening (with varying degrees of ease and effectiveness). The bail to over under position is denied via predeny but you can stop it. The back take from there is denied by holding triggers. The clinch will always be denied by a straight from any range (although not an official "deny" button and really any punch should be able to stop it). Single under doesn't have a deny button either, but punches will always stop it. The ground transitions from posture have a deny: denying the posture up.

                  Comment

                  • johnmangala
                    MVP
                    • Apr 2016
                    • 4525

                    #10
                    Re: The slip rear hook

                    Originally posted by RetractedMonkey
                    I mean there is nothing in the game without a direct counter or something you can do to stop it from even happening (with varying degrees of ease and effectiveness). The bail to over under position is denied via predeny but you can stop it. The back take from there is denied by holding triggers. The clinch will always be denied by a straight from any range (although not an official "deny" button and really any punch should be able to stop it). Single under doesn't have a deny button either, but punches will always stop it. The ground transitions from posture have a deny: denying the posture up.
                    That's some semantics.

                    Were talking about actual denials. Not counters.

                    Comment

                    • RetractedMonkey
                      MVP
                      • Dec 2017
                      • 1624

                      #11
                      Re: The slip rear hook

                      Originally posted by johnmangala
                      That's some semantics.

                      Were talking about actual denials. Not counters.
                      In that case, if you're lobbying for actual transition denials for postured transitions and clinch transitions I absolutely disagree. The postured transitions were a great addition and add another layer of complexity to the ground.

                      The clinch entry itself may or may not benefit from a dedicated denial depending on if they actually fixed the one sided-ness of the clinch.

                      The clinch transitions themselves should not have denials, but rather have a series of interlocking positional exchanges broken up by strikes. We have that right now, but it is again far too limited in scope.

                      Comment

                      • johnmangala
                        MVP
                        • Apr 2016
                        • 4525

                        #12
                        Re: The slip rear hook

                        Originally posted by RetractedMonkey
                        In that case, if you're lobbying for actual transition denials for postured transitions and clinch transitions I absolutely disagree. The postured transitions were a great addition and add another layer of complexity to the ground.

                        The clinch entry itself may or may not benefit from a dedicated denial depending on if they actually fixed the one sided-ness of the clinch.

                        The clinch transitions themselves should not have denials, but rather have a series of interlocking positional exchanges broken up by strikes. We have that right now, but it is again far too limited in scope.
                        What is that extra layer of complexity that with a stamina advantage you get undeniable transitions? Would you extend that logic to subs?

                        I dont mind undeniable clinch if it were more neutral, but as it is now there should be an actual denial.

                        I'm open to something to replace the denial system on the ground or clinch 50/50, but as it's done now it sucks for both. I dont like how clinch transitions work now, if you could elaborate how it could be expanded to something better I'm all ears.

                        Comment

                        • Evil97
                          MVP
                          • Apr 2016
                          • 1099

                          #13
                          Re: The slip rear hook

                          Originally posted by RetractedMonkey
                          In that case, if you're lobbying for actual transition denials for postured transitions and clinch transitions I absolutely disagree. The postured transitions were a great addition and add another layer of complexity to the ground.

                          The clinch entry itself may or may not benefit from a dedicated denial depending on if they actually fixed the one sided-ness of the clinch.

                          The clinch transitions themselves should not have denials, but rather have a series of interlocking positional exchanges broken up by strikes. We have that right now, but it is again far too limited in scope.
                          Sorry boopy, but postured transitions should be deniable with the risk of getting blasted if they punch you instead. Same for postured submissions. I would even be fine if it was a pre-deny requirement.

                          Sent from my SM-N960U using Operation Sports mobile app

                          Comment

                          • RetractedMonkey
                            MVP
                            • Dec 2017
                            • 1624

                            #14
                            Re: The slip rear hook

                            Originally posted by Evil97
                            Sorry boopy, but postured transitions should be deniable with the risk of getting blasted if they punch you instead. Same for postured submissions. I would even be fine if it was a pre-deny requirement.

                            Sent from my SM-N960U using Operation Sports mobile app
                            I agree with that because it adds even more layers to the ground. I was simply not in favor of removing them which, in hind sight, I don't think he was suggesting.

                            Comment

                            • Phillyboi207
                              Banned
                              • Apr 2012
                              • 3159

                              #15
                              Re: The slip rear hook

                              Originally posted by RetractedMonkey
                              In that case, if you're lobbying for actual transition denials for postured transitions and clinch transitions I absolutely disagree. The postured transitions were a great addition and add another layer of complexity to the ground.

                              The clinch entry itself may or may not benefit from a dedicated denial depending on if they actually fixed the one sided-ness of the clinch.

                              The clinch transitions themselves should not have denials, but rather have a series of interlocking positional exchanges broken up by strikes. We have that right now, but it is again far too limited in scope.
                              You actually like the new GnP system?

                              Comment

                              Working...