I'm thinking 1990 UNLV, 1996 Kentucky, 2001 Duke, 2007 Florida, and 2012 Kentucky could all beat the Nets.
Recommended Videos
Collapse
Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Re: Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
In my opinion no, and especially no to the 96 Kentucky squad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Re: Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
The Untouchables with McCarty, Delk, Walker, and Anderson. One of the most dominant teams ever.
Well I think all these teams could beat my Nets cause we suck and Lopez, Bogdonavic, and maybe Kilpatrick are the only decent players, the rest wouldn't even be able to start on some college basketball teams today such as Kansas and Duke.Comment
-
Re: Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
The Nets aren't talented at all. Only Lopez and Bogdonavic.
The rest of our players weren't even that good in college such as Kilpatrick at Cincy and Booker at Clemson. They were above average but overrated, and now they suck in the pros, but you say they won't lose to a Top 5 all-time college team just because they're "in the pros" lol.Comment
-
Re: Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
I posted this thread because I hate my Nets and think we're one of the worst teams ever all thanks to that idiot Billy King, what a fool, he probably has a GED and no education to make stupid moves like trading away the future for bums in their late 30s.
Yeah really dumb. At least I love Lopez and Bogdonavic. Nobody else on this team though. I like Kilpatrick and Booker to a lesser degree, but I know they are below average players padding fake stats.Comment
-
Re: Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
The gap is just massive. Every year you've got maybe 2-3 guys from the lottery that can produce with decent production at the NBA level.
Most of these guys you're considering not talented were also great players at the college level.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
Ya know what we're like 2010 Kentucky chemistry wise except with no talent. It's really sad. Traded away Favors for a PG who is washed up D-Will, and I liked D-Will on the Nets, but Favors is at least a very solid bench player, even though a ttotal bust given his HS prestige and GT pedigree and #3 overall.Comment
-
Re: Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
I would say no. College teams aren't deep enough to go 48 minutes with an NBA squad. I'll say this though, it's at least not as much of a joke to question it as much as it is when these topics get brought up in the NFL.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk ProIndianapolis Colts
Indiana Pacers
Indiana Hoosiers
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Comment
-
Re: Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
Brook would put up 40-20 against that 2010 squad(remember, we're getting THOSE players, not what we see of them NOW)and Lin would look like Wall does NOW against that team.
We go thru these silly discussions of can (insert college team) beat the worst NBA team(did this last year with the Sixers and everyone still had the Sixers getting the win)every year when we all know the answer and this year isn't any different. Stop with this tomfoolery, lol.#RespectTheCultureComment
-
Re: Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
But look at the rest of our players- Acy very good at Baylor not a dominant star though, Booker same at Clemson, Kilpatrick same at Cincy, Dinwiddie same at CU, Hollis-Jefferson basically an overrated bum at Zona, Levert sucked at Michigan imo, Lin beast at Harvard but he's OUT with injury, Whitehead overrated at Seton Hall, very overrated will be playing overseas in three years.
So you act like we have all these studs and lottery picks, but it's a really sad excuse for an NBA team. The only reason I think we MIGHT beat the top college teams is because of prototype size and wingspan to exploit matchups and our bench will be far more talented, but it's really sad cause I still think we'd lose to the best NCAA teams ever.Comment
-
Re: Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
Yeah true, because basketball is a sport that relies heavily on confidence over physicality. Like, for example in the NCAA you take '95 Nebraska, '01 Miami, '12 Alabama etc and put them against the 2008 Lions and the reason they'd lose is because Lions' have 350lb behemoths on the offensive and defensive lines to disrupt everything from happening even though some of the actual skill positon players for the Huskers, Canes, and Tide are way better than the people guarding or playing offense against them.Comment
-
Re: Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
I actually wish my Nets would set up an exhibition game against a team like UCLA, I would definitely watch it. Would be very entertaining lol watch Lonzo Ball cook Lin.Comment
-
Re: Would the best college teams ever beat the Nets?
The Nets aren't talented at all. Only Lopez and Bogdonavic.
The rest of our players weren't even that good in college such as Kilpatrick at Cincy and Booker at Clemson. They were above average but overrated, and now they suck in the pros, but you say they won't lose to a Top 5 all-time college team just because they're "in the pros" lol.
In the over the top, "I hate my Nets" world, it may be a funny throw away line (and not worth it's own thread, btw... can bitch about the Nets in the team thread or Off Topic). But in the real world the vegas line would be 20+ to whatever NBA team you want to put up against any of these college teams.Comment
Comment