So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

[ka520]

Are we going to have actual correct rosters in '11? Or are they gonna be all screwed up w/ players who graduated 2 years ago and have no freshmen like '10?

Has there been any word on this?

[whittleboy615]

Re: So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

Expect them to be screwed up since they base them off of spring rosters. Hopefully they will be better than last year's set though.

[buckeye02]

Re: So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

God i hope so. It will make the roster editing process a lot smoother.

[JalenTigh]

Re: So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

I am sure they will be just as fubar as previous years, particulary the non-bcs conferences. I would never expect perfection for the rosters when the game comes out, there is simply no way when final rosters are not announced by teams for nearly 2 month's after the game is released, but really, the last couple years have just been ridiculous, like monkeys were doing the rosters.

[MCSquared16]

Re: So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

Supposedly, 10 shipped with the wrong final rosters loaded, so I would hope they go a little overboard on the rosters to make them better this year. We'll see though, I appreciate all the work guys like luvtotha9s and others do to get them named!

[reco]

Re: So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

so far i know bama rosters are, they have players in the wrong position that were in the game last year,more of the same i say.

[St3fN_sTrApS]

Re: So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

Are we going to have actual correct rosters in '11? Or are they gonna be all screwed up w/ players who graduated 2 years ago and have no freshmen like '10?

Has there been any word on this?

Based off of the screenshots we have seen I doubt that we will. They still have Sergio Kindle, DE #2 for Texas in the screenshots.

[buckeye02]

Re: So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

Based off of the screenshots we have seen I doubt that we will. They still have Sergio Kindle, DE #2 for Texas in the screenshots.

Thats not a good sign. Do you think that it could be another player with the #2? And not S. Kindle?

[MWilliard2]

Re: So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

Based off of the screenshots we have seen I doubt that we will. They still have Sergio Kindle, DE #2 for Texas in the screenshots.

Every new year version of the game, when showing new screenshots shows players from the previous years as their screenshots. So I wouldn't get all upset right now.

[ConVick]

Re: So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

Every new year version of the game, when showing new screenshots shows players from the previous years as their screenshots. So I wouldn't get all upset right now.

It still boggles the mind how people don't understand this.

[St3fN_sTrApS]

Re: So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

Every new year version of the game, when showing new screenshots shows players from the previous years as their screenshots. So I wouldn't get all upset right now.

Who's getting upset? I just simply answered the question based off of what I have seen thus far.

It still boggles the mind how people don't understand this.

Oh really, boggles your mind huh, ha ha.

[duckfever8]

Re: So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

Last year, I saw a player on the Arizona Wildcats who graduated in 2007, no, just no...

They better fix stuff like that this year, and improve the ratings since locomotion is in and all that.

[ActLikeYouCrow]

Re: So are the rosters gonna be all f'd up like last years?

the rosters are screwed up every year. beyond the freshmen and graduated players another huge problem even after the roster update was the number of players who had the exact same ratings as they had on ncaa 2009. example being south carolina gamecocks who were on ncaa 2009 and ncaa 2010 only like 5 or so had their ratings adjusted at all and with the new emphasis on position specific ratings if i played a regular online game with them i had only 6 players over 80+ ovr on defense and only one de 70+.

personally i want ratings spread across the board a la madden and the crap with top 10 teams having backups with better ratings than all conference players on non top 10 teams to end.

generally year to year theyre just going to make some bad calls on putting around 5 players on each team when there were better candidates available. whether its guys who left the program during the spring, walkons ahead of viable freshmen, or guys buried on the depth chart ahead of guys on the two deep or challenging for a spot.