No ability to customize to a 6+6 CFP format

[Locke888]

This game looks amazing but if you are going to rebuild the PAC you need the 6+6 and I didn’t see anything mentioning to be able to do it. I wouldn’t surprised if it’s there when we get it though. I would really like to know if it’s possible.

[TarHeelPhenom]

Quote: Originally Posted by Locke888

This game looks amazing but if you are going to rebuild the PAC you need the 6+6 and I didn’t see anything mentioning to be able to do it. I wouldn’t surprised if it’s there when we get it though. I would really like to know if it’s possible.

In the Deep Dive it said it's the 5+1, with Notre Dame and the Pac-12 not being able to be any higher than #5 in the CFP. Either would have to play a 1st round game if they made it in. It may be something they could change?? I don't know.

[Momoney168]

Curious on this too as I plan to restore the Pac 12 and big 12 conferences. Although. I’m cool with the 5+7 model as long as the other champions are actually rated based off the schedule played within the season.

[grangdj77]

They got the exclusive rights to the CFP so if it's not in real life, I doubt they'll include it in game. I think Matt Brown or someone else asked in the past of possibly reverting back to a 4 team playoff and they said no/refuted it because of the rights to CFP and staying true to what it is.

[Raumdeuter]

Quote: Originally Posted by Momoney168

Curious on this too as I plan to restore the Pac 12 and big 12 conferences. Although. I’m cool with the 5+7 model as long as the other champions are actually rated based off the schedule played within the season.

One of the screenshots I saw in the deep dive had me slightly nervous for the ranking logic. 9-3 Texas being ranked over 10-2 Georgia, 12-1 Utah, and 10-2 Ohio State. Of course, I don't know the schedules or quality of win/loss, but if it's anything like 14, then Georgia lost to two ranked teams, one of which being road/neutral site, while Texas lost a home game by two touchdowns to an unranked team.

[spoofrice11]

What about creating prospects/draft classes?
That's one of my favorite thing to do on NCAA Football. I create themed classes and try to recruit some each year.

And heard we might not be able to edit player's attributes...
So I can't improve a players catching/speed, on my own game?
That seems ridiculous, especially since we already know they are a joke.
4-10 Colorado being ranked and Big 12 Co-Favorites Kansas State not.

[dickey1331]

Quote: Originally Posted by Raumdeuter

One of the screenshots I saw in the deep dive had me slightly nervous for the ranking logic. 9-3 Texas being ranked over 10-2 Georgia, 12-1 Utah, and 10-2 Ohio State. Of course, I don't know the schedules or quality of win/loss, but if it's anything like 14, then Georgia lost to two ranked teams, one of which being road/neutral site, while Texas lost a home game by two touchdowns to an unranked team.

Well it mimics real life as Florida state didn’t get in so any common sense is out the window.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[texranger]

Quote: Originally Posted by spoofrice11

What about creating prospects/draft classes? That's one of my favorite thing to do on NCAA Football. I create themed classes and try to recruit some each year. And heard we might not be able to edit player's attributes... So I can't improve a players catching/speed, on my own game? That seems ridiculous, especially since we already know they are a joke. 4-10 Colorado being ranked and Big 12 Co-Favorites Kansas State not.

Create a prospect is NOT in this year's version, and you can't edit the incoming recruits that are generated either (couldn't do that in the earlier version either BTW). Editing player attributes is not in either--at least as far as the real players. Nobody seems to know if we can edit the generic players on our roster or not.