Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

[cima]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

Well no because Curry is better than Nash was on offense and defense.

And he is AT LEAST an above average defender.

See this is what I'm talking about. You think offense is ONLY about a player's scoring ability. Fun fact using Per 100 Poss stats:

Curry had a 125 ORTG this year. 42.5 Points and 9.5 Assists per 100 poss. Crazy, right? Well in 06-07, Nash had an ORTG of 124. 26.4 points and an astonishing 16.5 assists per 100 poss.

So as you can see while Curry is definitely a better scorer, he's nowhere near the playmaker Steve Nash was. And playmaking my friend is OFFENSE.

[KingTocco]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

Omg can you guys get a room, seriously.

Curry can have a 99, he had an amazing season. Let's stop comparing him to all-time greats until his career is over...thanks.

No one should ever have a rating over a 99, no player is perfect and never will be.

[Mauer4MVP]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

See this is what I'm talking about. You think offense is ONLY about a player's scoring ability. Fun fact using Per 100 Poss stats:

Curry had a 125 ORTG this year. 42.5 Points and 9.5 Assists per 100 poss. Crazy, right? Well in 06-07, Nash had an ORTG of 124. 26.4 points and an astonishing 16.5 assists per 100 poss.

So as you can see while Curry is definitely a better scorer, he's nowhere near the playmaker Steve Nash was. And playmaking my friend is OFFENSE.

That's the most preposterous thing I've ever read and again are looking at stats without context.

[Mauer4MVP]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

Omg can you guys get a room, seriously.

Curry can have a 99, he had an amazing season. Let's stop comparing him to all-time greats until his career is over...thanks.

No one should ever have a rating over a 99, no player is perfect and never will be.

1. You didn't have to click on the thread.
2. No, comparing him to all-time greats is completely legit considering he had one of the best seasons ever. Talking about all time great seasons is definitely a legitimate conversation.

[cvhji]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

Not at all. He's a legendary player, future HOFer and probably the best player in the league right now. But if 2K is sticking to it's policy of ratings, Curry is not in the conversation of thee best player of all time. Sorry.

[BA2929]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

Not at all. He's a legendary player, future HOFer and probably the best player in the league right now. But if 2K is sticking to it's policy of ratings, Curry is not in the conversation of thee best player of all time. Sorry.

I don't think you understand the rating system they put in place this year.

It was about individual seasons, not career accomplishments.

So, 2016 Steph is indeed worth of a 99 overall rating. I mean, he made 400+ 3's. Nobody else has even made more than 276 outside of Steph himself. He's also the greatest shooter of all time and it isn't even close.

But to answer the question: No, no player deserves more than a 99 overall. 99 max is fine.

[jeebs9]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

I don't think you understand the rating system they put in place this year.

It was about individual seasons, not career accomplishments.

So, 2016 Steph is indeed worth of a 99 overall rating. I mean, he made 400+ 3's. Nobody else has even made more than 276 outside of Steph himself. He's also the greatest shooter of all time and it isn't even close.

But to answer the question: No, no player deserves more than a 99 overall. 99 max is fine.

That might be a bot man... More and more everyday smh

[KingTocco]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

That might be a bot man... More and more everyday smh

Almost typed the same thing, dude posted on like 10 different threads with a weird name like the bots have.

Either that or he's a dude that got banned and he's just trollin

[redsox4evur]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

Almost typed the same thing, dude posted on like 10 different threads with a weird name like the bots have.



Either that or he's a dude that got banned and he's just trollin

nah it's a bot.

[BA2929]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

That might be a bot man... More and more everyday smh

Yea, you're right. I didn't even look at the name when I responded.

Someone probably said that though, so my point still stands, I suppose. Even if I replied to a computer lol

[jeebs9]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

Yea, you're right. I didn't even look at the name when I responded.

Someone probably said that though, so my point still stands, I suppose. Even if I replied to a computer lol

Don't worry its been happening to me a lot lately. Just the other day I replied to a bot. But said "I know your a bot. But I'm going to answer your question" Hahaha Like I said it's pretty damn good bot.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[A6_Foul_Out]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

That's the thing as well.

Making Curry's rating 99 or 102 or 110 doesn't really matter. The little kids who this will "hype up" will still be just as bad with his character in-game. running left and right shooting red shots.

The people that actually know how to use the character would just as effective with his base card or base dynamic.

[MoneyOvaHuds]

Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

This is the stuff curry does on defense https://twitter.com/ten000hours/stat...78774493249536


He's also a smart team defender

He's just solid no liability, of course certain matchups he will be outmatched but that can be said about anyone

[E The Rhymer]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

He's rated pretty accurately. Best shooter in the game, great finishing, good defence, good rebounding, passing is a little overrated. Only prime MJ and Miami Heat LeBron should have 98-99 ratings imo.

No Kobe? No Wilt? No Kareem?

[jfsolo]

Re: Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

The best OV that I would give any player in any season that we've seen so far is probably a 95. IMO, to be rated higher than that a player would need to be in the top ten in basically every statistical measurement on both offense and defense in the league for that year. To get a 99 you would need to be in the top three.

Great for your position or size, isn't a compelling argument.