NBA 2K12 Roster Update Available Now (1-7-12) - Video of Changes Included

[JaySmooov]

Quote: Originally Posted by fatleg3

Best post in this thread. If you dont like the game or you are unsatisfied then trade it in and keep it moving.

Yeah. It's almost like some guys repeatedly post things in here to get guys to join the movement or something.

[MELO7NYK]

2k share is back up on PS3. Harrellson looks like hell, but at least he's there lol.

Still looking forward to see if they will fix some details like jersey colors and tattoos, but I doubt it.

[Preo32]

Quote: Originally Posted by JaySmooov

He's rated low because all he does is score. Big men's ratings are geared towards defense, rebounding, etc. Plus, athleticism plays a big factor in ratings for everyone in sports games period. Trust me, he can score in the game though.

I understand that. Im a fan of the team and I know overall he doesnt do much other than shoot well, but I feel 69 is low when you have rookies who havent shown much at all are rated 70 or higher. To me, Bargnani should be somewhere in the 72-74 range. Because he is a 7-footer but doesnt play like one, so I dont feel he should be low because hes not your typical 7-footer. Personally in the game, Ive put him at SF a lot, and while thats a loss of athleticism overall on the floor, the lineup is much bigger when he's there and it fits his style of play way more than center. I saw in that vid of the changes Kenneth Faried was a 70.... I like him a lot and he is somebody in this game I would trade for, but for him to already be higher than Bargnani is crazy

[Colts18]

No Bargnani should be able to play like Bargnani. Forget the overall rating. No need to say he should be a 72-76. As long as he plays like he plays that is all that matters.

But I agree that rookies come in too high. Unproven talent.

[gator3guy]

Having played Bargnani plenty of times his overall means nothing. Guy is unstoppable. I swear he shoots at least 70% every time I play him.

[cb1115]

Still no Magic black alternates in the game. SMH.

[PrettyT11]

Quote: Originally Posted by Preo32

I understand that. Im a fan of the team and I know overall he doesnt do much other than shoot well, but I feel 69 is low when you have rookies who havent shown much at all are rated 70 or higher. To me, Bargnani should be somewhere in the 72-74 range. Because he is a 7-footer but doesnt play like one, so I dont feel he should be low because hes not your typical 7-footer. Personally in the game, Ive put him at SF a lot, and while thats a loss of athleticism overall on the floor, the lineup is much bigger when he's there and it fits his style of play way more than center. I saw in that vid of the changes Kenneth Faried was a 70.... I like him a lot and he is somebody in this game I would trade for, but for him to already be higher than Bargnani is crazy

There are no rookie centers rated higher than him. You can't really compare the overall by positions because the formula is different for each position.

But more specifically about Bargnani there is no way you can get his overall up that high without greatly overrating him in multiple categories. The dude is nothing but a scorer. He doesn't block shots, is a horrible defender, and a horrible rebounder. All of those is going to kill your overall if you are a center. There is no reason at all for a seven footer to be playing 36 minutes a night and get less than 6 rebounds.

[I Djm]

Quote: Originally Posted by DaTwolves21

Is there anyway I can the new players added and apply them to a previous roster.

nope you are pretty much f'd