Madden NFL 10 Ratings: Top 10 by Position (ESPN Videogames)

[shotgun styles]

Quote: Originally Posted by Glorious Arc

+1 Besides what else is there to talk about right now? The game is almost done, so its not like we can change much of the "big" stuff. Rating changes are very easy in comparison.

Yeah, this is the dead part of the off-season. It's all wait and see at this point.

Besides, I love discussing (arguing) with y'all about this stuff.

[NYGmen56]

Quote: Originally Posted by GoGiaNTS25

westbrook has 99 agility and 99 elusiveness? isnt that a little too much or am i just too much of a homer?

NO JOKE! Seriously he is not Barry Sanders Now?!! Come on..

[Glorious Arc]

Quote: Originally Posted by shotgun styles

Yeah, this is the dead part of the off-season. It's all wait and see at this point. Besides, I love discussing (arguing) with y'all about this stuff.

We finally have some "real" attributes to discuss/argue about hence why I joined in on the fun. I really wonder why they didnt list finesse and power move next to the man/zone coverage...Makes almost no sense to show us the top 8 defensive players coverage stats if they are linemen

[shotgun styles]

Quote: Originally Posted by Glorious Arc

We finally have some "real" attributes to discuss/argue about hence why I joined in on the fun. I really wonder why they didnt list finesse and power move next to the man/zone coverage...Makes almost no sense to show us the top 10 defensive players coverage stats if they are linemen

And I will repeat what another poster above said, how the hell is James Harrison NOT a top 10 player? WTF? Defensive player of the year, greatest play in SB history AND won his second ring.

[steelers1]

Quote: Originally Posted by kjcheezhead

Aaron Rodgers played as many games with a seperated shoulder-so injury speaking its a draw. Now to the numbers: Rodgers 28 tds 13 ints 4038 yrds 93.8 rating BigBen 17 tds 15 ints 3301 yrds 80.1 rating How come Ben got the ring and Rodgers didnt? Oh yeah, Green Bays defense was a sieve just like New Orleans who also has a great QB without a ring. As for the Super Bowl who knows how the game wouldve went if Arizona scored that td instead of Pitt at the half, all I do know is that d made the biggest play of the game right there and without it, the Cards may well have been world champions.

I believe without Roethlisberger, the Steelers wouldn't have won 8 games last year. I also believe that even if the Steelers have a mediocre defense (won't happen as long as Lebeau is there), with Ben under center they will always have a chance.

Football is a team effort. So yeah, any team that has a bad defense is going to lose. Aaron Rodgers is a good QB, and put up good numbers, but it's a completely different system and he played against easier defenses. (He had 600+ yards and 6 TDs in 2 games against the Lions last year.) I also agree completely that the Packers D was the reason they sucked last year. But I think it was on ESPN they had Rodgers' stats when he had an opportunity to lead a game winning drive and the numbers were terrible.

Aaron Rodgers threw 4 game losing interceptions last year. Roethlisberger led 6 game winning drives in the 4th quarter, including the Super Bowl. I'll take a never say die, win-ugly QB over a losing QB with pretty numbers. End of story.

[SoxFan01605]

Quote: Originally Posted by Glorious Arc

We finally have some "real" attributes to discuss/argue about hence why I joined in on the fun. I really wonder why they didnt list finesse and power move next to the man/zone coverage...Makes almost no sense to show us the top 10 defensive players coverage stats if they are linemen

Of course, one could also argue that it made no sense to group all the defensive players in the first place.

ESPN for ya!

[Glorious Arc]

Quote: Originally Posted by shotgun styles

And I will repeat what another poster above said, how the hell is James Harrison NOT a top 10 player? WTF? Defensive player of the year, greatest play in SB history AND won his second ring.

I wonder where he is myself. I would laugh if he was number 9 on the list but still you would think he would be rated higher then a 97.

[shotgun styles]

Quote: Originally Posted by SoxFan01605

Of course, one could also argue that it made no sense to group all the defensive players in the first place. ESPN for ya!

They've been playing too much fantasy football..