Madden NFL 10 Ratings: Top 10 by Position (ESPN Videogames)

[Dcooks]

Man there is no way that troy polomalu has 93 speed, hes like a quick linebacker, that can cover well. especially since ed reed has 93 speed

[Glorious Arc]

I lied I dont rest my case lol here is my post in the official ratings thread...I wonder why this one hasnt been locked?

If Turner has 98 carry with 127 touches per fumble then LT should have 120 carry with his 719 touches and one fumble over the last two seasons.

Quote:

Turner should be lowered to 94-95 carry because he is still good but he is not the best. Williams should be higher as well with 97-98 behind LTs 99. Williams over the past 3 seasons has had 616 touches with only one fumble. For those thinking I am being a homer about Turner and Williams...Turner has had a total of 5 fumbles in 5 seasons averaging 124 touches per fumble. It is great compared to other RBs but he is still not better then Williams or LT

[shotgun styles]

Quote: Originally Posted by Dcooks

Man there is no way that troy polomalu has 93 speed, hes like a quick linebacker, that can cover well. especially since ed reed has 93 speed

Oh I agree. Speed is not his game, anticipation and violence is.

His zone coverage and play recognition skills are and should be though the roof. His tackling should be higher than 63 though. His speed should be 88-90 range.

[kjcheezhead]

Quote: Originally Posted by steelers1

OK, now you'll see my bias. Ben did have a pretty average year statistically. But in reality he had a good year with a really bad 3 game stretch. During that stretch he was also playing injured (no excuses, but he's been known to stay in games even when he probably shouldn't be in aka 2006).

Aaron Rodgers played as many games with a seperated shoulder-so injury speaking its a draw.

Now to the numbers:

Rodgers 28 tds 13 ints 4038 yrds 93.8 rating
BigBen 17 tds 15 ints 3301 yrds 80.1 rating

How come Ben got the ring and Rodgers didnt? Oh yeah, Green Bays defense was a sieve just like New Orleans who also has a great QB without a ring.

As for the Super Bowl who knows how the game wouldve went if Arizona scored that td instead of Pitt at the half, all I do know is that d made the biggest play of the game right there and without it, the Cards may well have been world champions.

[Yo-Yo]

Hahah. It's funny how you guys argue over everything. I think that most of the ratings are passable and all those "Oh his speed is too high-his TH Power is too high-he doesnt deserve it" are funny. You guys are like little kids. Im not being a jerk but you guys need to chill. The ratings can never satisfy a fan of a certain team and that's ok.

[shotgun styles]

Quote: Originally Posted by Yo-Yo

Hahah. It's funny how you guys argue over everything. I think that most of the ratings are passable and all those "Oh his speed is too high-his TH Power is too high-he doesnt deserve it" are funny. You guys are like little kids. Im not being a jerk but you guys need to chill. The ratings can never satisfy a fan of a certain team and that's ok.

Well we appreciate being called names by a guy with 4 posts.

This whole board is about feedback to the Dev team. So what we say here matters, and the debate is worth having even if it didn't.

[Glorious Arc]

Quote: Originally Posted by kjcheezhead

Aaron Rodgers played as many games with a seperated shoulder-so injury speaking its a draw. Now to the numbers: Rodgers 28 tds 13 ints 4038 yrds 93.8 rating BigBen 17 tds 15 ints 3301 yrds 80.1 rating How come Ben got the ring and Rodgers didnt? Oh yeah, Green Bays defense was a sieve just like New Orleans who also has a great QB without a ring. As for the Super Bowl who knows how the game wouldve went if Arizona scored that td instead of Pitt at the half, all I do know is that d made the biggest play of the game right there and without it, the Cards may well have been world champions.

You can do the easy work and look at the overall picture of what happened in the 2008 season and say that this QB performed better. But can you take a look at what teams you played and then compare the defenses each team faced and say the same thing? The answer is no you cant.

The Steelers as I already posted have played 8 games against the top rated defenses including both best pass defense and the top ten for least points allowed per game. The steelers had no offensive line and no run game.

The packers on the other hand. Played against 7 of the bottom 10 pass defenses and only played against 3 teams with top ten defenses. They had a decent running game and a better offensive line then the steelers.

Its no wonder why Rogers put up better numbers. None of the teams he played against where all that great at defending the pass.

[Glorious Arc]

Quote: Originally Posted by shotgun styles

Well we appreciate being called names by a guy with 4 posts. This whole board is about feedback to the Dev team. So what we say here matters, and the debate is worth having even if it didn't.

+1

Besides what else is there to talk about right now? The game is almost done, so its not like we can change much of the "big" stuff. Rating changes are very easy in comparison.