Front Office Football Central

Front Office Football Central (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//index.php)
-   Off Topic (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   OOTP 21 First Look (https://forums.operationsports.com/fofc//showthread.php?t=96590)

spleen1015 05-26-2020 08:55 AM

Year 6, 22!!!! players 70 or above. All pitchers....

MizzouRah 05-26-2020 10:20 AM

I think you're right spleen... I do not like what they did to scouting. I have no idea why my players go from "very high" scouted to "low" in a matter of weeks. Makes no sense to me.


My players should always be highly scouted. If they progress or decline, my scout should automatically update their scouting report with out me having to request another scouting report.


As far as the draft, seems fine to me playing MLB league with all fictional players.

Mota 05-27-2020 09:13 AM

One thing that really bothers me is the scouting knowledge. I noticed that my knowledge dropped from one season to the next. If the player is on my team and i watch him every game, why would I suddenly know less about him?

I do think at this point that the TEW scouting would be better. You get a range, and as the player plays more professional sports, the range would be more and more precise. Maybe Good/Great stuff in the beginning, then A-E grade after 2 years, and then the 20-80 grade after that. And if you spend scouting time on a specific player, you can narrow it down earlier. But by now, I don't need to send out a scout to see if Mike Trout is a good batter.

Maple Leafs 05-27-2020 11:56 AM

Kind of random but this seems like the place to say it: I needed a simple phone game to get me through quarantine and I wound up back with MLBM 2018, which is basically the app version of OOTP.

Verdict: It still holds up. I just can't get into the complexity of OOTP these days, but MLBM strips most of that out and strikes a really nice balance of offering a career sim without forcing you to set up and monitor dozens of things. The AI isn't perfect, but it's pretty good for an app. For a couple of bucks, you really can't go wrong.

Vegas Vic 06-03-2020 11:22 AM

Everyone plays the game differently, and that's one of the great features of this game. For the best experience, I would recommend turning off having the game generate international free agents and independent league free agents. I enable all of the international and independent leagues, so the free agents have actual histories. Japan and Korea have a posting system for free agents, and I also enable posting for Cuba to simulate defections.

I prefer to play with the real league setup, but fictional players. I usually erase the MLB history and sim ahead about 50 years before taking over a team. I also play GM only, so my manager has full charge of the lineup card and game management.


cougarfreak 06-12-2020 12:46 PM

The Mac version of OOTP 21 has really gotten screwed up. I can't find the folder to add extras like quick starts, uniforms, etc. Steam has nothing to add on to the game via their workshop. It really seems like it's catering to folks who just play the current year, or whatever the Perfect game stuff is.

lungs 06-12-2020 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cougarfreak (Post 3285842)
The Mac version of OOTP 21 has really gotten screwed up. I can't find the folder to add extras like quick starts, uniforms, etc. Steam has nothing to add on to the game via their workshop. It really seems like it's catering to folks who just play the current year, or whatever the Perfect game stuff is.


I don’t have it in front of me but if I remember right go Library > Containers > Ootp Developments > Application Support > Ootp21

GrantDawg 07-05-2020 10:29 AM

Here is where I am on this game: After buying it every year forever it seems, I can get it as a part of my subscription to Xbox PC, and I don't even feel like downloading it. Tell me if there has been any real sim improvements over last years "blah?" And for the record, I would rather have needles poked into my eyes than play the card game thing.,

Coffee Warlord 07-05-2020 11:49 AM

Draft/scouting still screwy? I picked this up on the summer sale, haven't touched it yet, and re-reading this thread, I'm seriously debating just refunding it.

spleen1015 07-31-2020 11:46 AM

I've been simming a 2020 league in OOTP21 as each day passes in RL.

The Yankees were 12.5 games behind on July 1st. After today's games, they are only 3 games behind. I hate the Yankees.

Young Drachma 07-31-2020 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cougarfreak (Post 3285842)
The Mac version of OOTP 21 has really gotten screwed up. I can't find the folder to add extras like quick starts, uniforms, etc. Steam has nothing to add on to the game via their workshop. It really seems like it's catering to folks who just play the current year, or whatever the Perfect game stuff is.



But yeah they've never embraced the workshop and most of the stuff is all on the forums still, that part hasn't changed at all.

Mota 07-31-2020 06:55 PM

I have every mlb roster ever made and it automatically updates the logos, jerseys and stadiums over the years. I don’t really need anything else. Strat-o-matic wants to sell me each season for 27.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

JPhillips 10-11-2020 04:22 PM

The 60 game season update completed screwed the financials. Teams start with tens of millions of extra budget space.

GrantDawg 10-12-2020 06:18 AM

A new company has bought OOTP developments: Big News - An announcement by Andreas & Markus - OOTP Developments Forums

Flasch186 10-12-2020 07:41 AM

Don't care, not buying since they fucked over Jim.

JPhillips 10-12-2020 08:19 AM

I'm fuessing an all mobile company until this purchase isn't going to be focused on the PC game.

PilotMan 10-12-2020 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrantDawg (Post 3306098)


These things almost never work out the way you hope they do or they ruin what was there. Color me incredibly skeptical and slightly disappointed, but not surprised in the least.

LastWhiteSoxFanStanding 10-12-2020 08:32 AM

This could be the reason they didn't help Jim. Who knows how long the negotiations have been going on? But the game has been stale for years now. Stick a fork in OOTP , it's done.

JPhillips 10-12-2020 10:17 AM

I think Jim was telling us this was coming without specifically telling us this was coming. As a business move, it's probably a great decision, but it sure looks like the plan will be more of the on-line and in game purchase market.

DanGarion 10-12-2020 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flasch186 (Post 3306107)
Don't care, not buying since they fucked over Jim.


Where are there comments from Jim that they fucked him over? I don't really seem many comments from Jim at all this year.

Atocep 10-12-2020 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotMan (Post 3306116)
These things almost never work out the way you hope they do or they ruin what was there. Color me incredibly skeptical and slightly disappointed, but not surprised in the least.


I agree. I'm sure it's going to make them money, but this isn't good news for PC OOTP fans. This is a mobile games company that doesn't exactly have a history of making great games. If they don't take steps to monetize every aspect of the game and push further and further toward Perfect Team I'll be shocked.

stevew 10-12-2020 01:27 PM

Puresim better.

RainMaker 10-12-2020 02:50 PM

I still think OOTP is a good game but this seems like a bad omen. They aren't buying it for base OOTP, they're buying it for Perfect Team.

dubb93 10-12-2020 03:03 PM

My favorite quote on the OOTP forums, "I'd like to be optimistic but Com2uS support has a dreadful reputation and I don't see how we should be excited about OOTP being acquired by a korean gacha app factory specializing in microtransactions."

spleen1015 10-12-2020 03:12 PM

My initial thoughts every time there was been a big change in the OOTP-verse have always been positive. Not this time.

I feel like Markus and Andreas are cashing out.

I hope I'm wrong.

Swaggs 10-12-2020 03:38 PM

I think it is still a great game, but the most recent version seemed like a step back with the draft problems. I bought this year's version, but play last year's just because the problems this year made it a less fun game to play.

I don't blame them for focusing on Perfect Team if it is a money maker with the pay-to-win gameplay. I think it is alright to play, too, but I think it is weak how little effort they put into the cards (no pictures for players past this year, no tie-in with a card company, etc.)

If it is the end, I'll still play the older versions. They are good enough, for the most part.

sovereignstar v2 10-12-2020 04:06 PM

Yikes.

Sweed 10-12-2020 04:26 PM

With Markus no longer having the final word I am a bit worried about the future being put in the hands of bean counters. I have said with each new release "if this were the last I could play it forever". So there is that.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Swaggs (Post 3306174)
I think it is still a great game, but the most recent version seemed like a step back with the draft problems. I bought this year's version, but play last year's just because the problems this year made it a less fun game to play.

I don't blame them for focusing on Perfect Team if it is a money maker with the pay-to-win gameplay. I think it is alright to play, too, but I think it is weak how little effort they put into the cards (no pictures for players past this year, no tie-in with a card company, etc.)

If it is the end, I'll still play the older versions. They are good enough, for the most part.


I play out every game so IOW slowly. My first draft was a bit into the patch cycle (early August) and I found the new draft much better than old versions. I'll save time and link to a thread I started about my draft experience.

https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com/...d.php?t=319942


Don't want to derail the thread but thought you might find it interesting? Could be it's down to style of play too as I can update and look at scouting reports daily. In any case I saw talent all the way through and enjoyed the process.

Feel free to disagree :)

MizzouRah 10-12-2020 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spleen1015 (Post 3306173)
My initial thoughts every time there was been a big change in the OOTP-verse have always been positive. Not this time.

I feel like Markus and Andreas are cashing out.

I hope I'm wrong.


Kind of has this feeling to me too... sort of a plan for the future to eventually move into mobile and microtransactions territory. Hopefully they continue to release OOTP as a standalone product, but I'm not too excited for this move.

I've played 21 more than any other Steam game though, so if this was the final copy, I could carry on.

Vegas Vic 10-12-2020 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MizzouRah (Post 3306194)
I've played 21 more than any other Steam game though, so if this was the final copy, I could carry on.


Same here. I play with fictional players, so OOTP21 will work well into the future for me.

MizzouRah 10-12-2020 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vegas Vic (Post 3306207)
Same here. I play with fictional players, so OOTP21 will work well into the future for me.


Me too.. MLB setup but with fictional players.

Critch 10-13-2020 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3306114)
I'm fuessing an all mobile company until this purchase isn't going to be focused on the PC game.


Looks like you're guessing right:

"In an email to press, Com2us noted that Out of the Park Baseball would "make for an excellent mobile series moving forward"; "

https://www.gamesindustry.biz/amp/20...k-developments

PilotMan 10-13-2020 09:21 AM

It's kind of sad that the very best PC baseball game on the market is going to be bastardized for cash. I am completely fine with Markus and Andreas cashing out, and I hope it leads to better development of new games if this is the end of the line for OOTP for PC, it's fine. Overall, it's a great game right now, and I could get years out of it, but it still feels like it's the end of the line.

dubb93 10-13-2020 11:48 AM

21 versions is a long time to do anything. I wonder if them deciding to sell the company had anything to do with the falling out with Jim. I imagine American football isn’t nearly as popular in Korea as baseball is.

Mota 10-13-2020 08:11 PM

Why would the new company support a mode where you use a fictional team budget to acquire your players, when instead you can use a gamer's real money to acquire players?
I thought Perfect Team was the worst thing to happen to the game. It turns out it was the precursor to the worst thing to happen to the game.

Swaggs 10-13-2020 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweed (Post 3306185)
With Markus no longer having the final word I am a bit worried about the future being put in the hands of bean counters. I have said with each new release "if this were the last I could play it forever". So there is that.




I play out every game so IOW slowly. My first draft was a bit into the patch cycle (early August) and I found the new draft much better than old versions. I'll save time and link to a thread I started about my draft experience.

https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com/...d.php?t=319942


Don't want to derail the thread but thought you might find it interesting? Could be it's down to style of play too as I can update and look at scouting reports daily. In any case I saw talent all the way through and enjoyed the process.

Feel free to disagree :)


Thanks - I’ll check it out again, soon. If the draft got better, I think it’s about as good as I would ever need, unless they would figure out how to integrate college (and maybe high school) into a playable/fun option. There were some under the radar improvements to league setups and sorting coaches/staff in this version that were superior, in my opinion, but the draft changes were too big of a dealbreaker.

spleen1015 10-20-2020 06:01 PM

This is the playoff picture of the daily sim I have been running.


Toddzilla 10-21-2020 08:23 AM

When has "big company purchases beloved software franchise from original creators" ever turned out to be a good thing?

Toddzilla 10-23-2020 10:03 AM

Can someone help explain and maybe help me fix this...

Managing the Cubs, trading set to Hard, I shop Victor Caratini and Houston offers Jose Altuve.

That should never happen under any circumstance whatsoever ever never in a jillion years.

spleen1015 10-23-2020 10:14 AM

OOTP sees ratings/stats not names. :D

PilotMan 10-23-2020 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toddzilla (Post 3307808)
Can someone help explain and maybe help me fix this...

Managing the Cubs, trading set to Hard, I shop Victor Caratini and Houston offers Jose Altuve.

That should never happen under any circumstance whatsoever ever never in a jillion years.


It does if it just came out that Altuve was nailing the owners underage daughter and nobody knows about it yet. OOTP big brain smarts.

JPhillips 10-23-2020 11:08 AM

Most of the time the trade AI is pretty good, but, yeah, every now and then there's a real headscratcher. I could have traded a 26-year-old outfielder that had played limited innings in the majors and didn't OBP over .300 for two top thirty prospects.

Before someone else says it, the prospects ratings are often screwy, but still, that trade shouldn't have been possible.

edit: For the Altuve trade, I bet it was salary related. The AI will take almost nothing for high salary players.

Sweed 10-23-2020 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3307823)
Most of the time the trade AI is pretty good, but, yeah, every now and then there's a real headscratcher. I could have traded a 26-year-old outfielder that had played limited innings in the majors and didn't OBP over .300 for two top thirty prospects.

Before someone else says it, the prospects ratings are often screwy, but still, that trade shouldn't have been possible.

edit: For the Altuve trade, I bet it was salary related. The AI will take almost nothing for high salary players.


I agree with this. First thing is I can easily not do one of these trades though, occasionally the salary dump is so blatant I wouldn't even want to. Second thing is I don't see the AI do these trades with other AI teams. With that in mind it doesn't bother me at all, YMMV :)

Atocep 10-23-2020 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPhillips (Post 3307823)
Most of the time the trade AI is pretty good, but, yeah, every now and then there's a real headscratcher. I could have traded a 26-year-old outfielder that had played limited innings in the majors and didn't OBP over .300 for two top thirty prospects.

Before someone else says it, the prospects ratings are often screwy, but still, that trade shouldn't have been possible.

edit: For the Altuve trade, I bet it was salary related. The AI will take almost nothing for high salary players.


I would almost guarantee it's salary related. The AI doesn't really value 30+ year old high salary players at all and it's usually the real life players within the first 1-3 years of starting a league that fall into that category.

And yeah, there are some odd holes in the AI. Some prospects don't seem valued enough, but those instances are fairly rare from what I've seen. It's usually guys outside the top 20 or so overall.

RainMaker 10-23-2020 04:23 PM

The AI loves to dump salaries. And due to the baked in salaries when starting the game, there are a few teams that desperately need to cut. Can't remember who it was but one team had a -80 million budget at one point in time.

For what it's worth, Caratini always turns into a monster in my sims. Perennial All-Star catcher.

Toddzilla 10-23-2020 05:10 PM

:) thanks for the tip

Mota 10-26-2020 03:01 PM

I would love to make a trade like that. I find the AI is so stingy, I can't get them to trade any top 30 prospects until I am offering my #1 player in his prime. And in those trades, my AI is going "are you kidding me?".
I do think the game overvalues catchers, I did one time make a trade where I felt I won, and that was trading away a catcher. So maybe the internal value for that position is greater.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.